Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What should the federal minimum wage be in the United States?
No minimum wage - (employers/company decision) 84 45.41%
$7.25 (as of 2012) 5 2.70%
$8 3 1.62%
$9 9 4.86%
$10 29 15.68%
$11 7 3.78%
$12 19 10.27%
$13 or higher 29 15.68%
Voters: 185. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-27-2012, 08:57 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
195 posts, read 648,514 times
Reputation: 123

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Min wage is typically paid for unskilled labor. What talent is needed to be a cashier at McDonalds ?
Be able to speak English and know how to handle money
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-27-2012, 08:57 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,047,114 times
Reputation: 10270
There should not be a federal or state minimum wage.

The employers will not dictate one either.

The free market always finds the correct wage for the value of a job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2012, 08:58 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,047,114 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorthNJ View Post
Currently as of 2012 - the federal minimum wage is $7.25/hour.

Most states adopted the federal minimum wage, however some states have their own minimum wage, ranging from as low as $5.15/hour in Wyoming, to as high as $9.04/hour in Washington State. Few cities, such as San Francisco have a minimum wage of $10.24/hour.

What is a fair amount of minimum wage in the United States do you think? I think it should be $10 an hour.
Why?

Why not $1,000 an hour?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2012, 09:02 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,047,114 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by subsound View Post
Yeah...

What would a number of educated, experienced, expert professionals over the course of 7 decades know in comparison to what you feel about it?

One's educational pedigree doesn't outweigh the strength of the argument.

Artificially mandated wages have not helped anything but to distort the true value of a job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2012, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
I understand your argument but disagree with it. The component of minimum wage employees to the final price is minimal. As an example, McDonald's pays it's register employees the MW ($7.25.) During an hour of work, the employee processes hundreds of dollars of transactions. Thus, raising the MW from $7.25 to $9.25 adds $2/hr. to cost. If the employer wanted to pass that along to customers, they'd add $2 to the hundreds of dollars charged, or 1-2%. So, costs go up 1-2% while the employee gets a 27.5% raise. I don't see how that hurts the employee.
The average McDonalds store employs 40-60 people so that's not one cashier bumped $2.00.

And that min wage bump of $2.00 gets spread all the way through the supply chain to all min wage workers.

Your math is too simplistic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2012, 09:08 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,047,114 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by subsound View Post
No, they provided a detailed reasoning a logical conclusion that has been reviewed and reaffirmed by many people with detailed education and extensive experience in the subject. Your logic is that you just "reject it" as a rebuttal. Two words without any backup is not any sort of rebuttal to a detailed document like that. Also no, because I don't agree with your pathetic assessment doesn't mean total trust. That is a false dichotomy, and a really awfully bad one at that.
If their intelligence and understanding are so great, why do most lefties feel that the "minimum wage" is not good enough?

You would think that with their combined brain power all would be well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2012, 09:11 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,039,086 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
And that min wage bump of $2.00 gets spread all the way through the supply chain to all min wage workers.
Exactly, the costs go up across the board for EVERYTHING whether it's fuel for their trucks, the burger meat, the spatula to flip the burger, the french fries , uniforms, the paper bags or even the balls they use in play area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2012, 09:12 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,047,114 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
get rid of handouts to the rich. No reason or authority for our federal government to be subsidizing the greedy.
Who are more "greedy"? Those who pay millions in taxes + millions more in charity, or the people who sit around waiting for their check to be deposited and their food stamp debit card to be refilled?

Rich doesn't equal greedy.

This same government that you place all of your trust in are the very ones who made the tax laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2012, 09:13 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,047,114 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultor View Post
Actually, min wage was the Progressive eugenicists' tool to weed out unfit workers for eventual segregation and sterilization:

Retrospectives
Eugenics and Economics in the Progressive Era
That's WAY to complicated for the liberal elite intelligencia to understand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2012, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Duluth, Minnesota, USA
7,639 posts, read 18,121,762 times
Reputation: 6913
It depends. I think it should be structured like this:

$12.00 / hour: Employees of companies with over 1000 employees with 2+ dependents
$10.50 / hour: Employees of companies with fewer than 1000 employees with <2 dependents OR employees of companies with 50 - 999 employees with 2+ dependents
$9.00 / hour: Employees of companies with fewer than 50 employees with 2+ dependents OR employees of companies with 50 - 999 employees with <2 dependents
$7.50 / hour: Employees of companies with fewer than 50 employees with <2 dependents

Either that, OR have the government subsidize low-wage employment by making up the difference between minimum wage and $12 / hour for families and $9-10.50 / hour for individuals through an entitlement program/s (food stamps, etc. could count towards this purpose but alone would not suffice), funded by taxing incomes above those levels proportionally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top