Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If Georgia announces the defendant is off the ballot because hes not qualified, expect a rush appeal to the SCOTUS. This would force the Court to peek at natural born citizen.
The original argument, one raised by the Clinton supporters, is that a natural born citizen requires both parents to be a citizen. That argument has been hijacked by so many others and twisted.
ok, i'm back. i see that you've already been discussing this in detail with other posters so i just have a few questions so i'm clear on your position.
- do you believe that the argument is about dual-citizenship, 2 US citizen parents or both?
( not all children born to a foreign parent gain dual-citizenship and dual citizenship can be gained after birth to someone born to 2 US citizen parents )
- do you believe "dual-citizenship/2parent" was the original birther argument?
- do you believe that "dual-citizenship/2parent" was the first birther legal challenge?
- do you believe that orly's subpoenas legally obligated those subpoenaed to produce what she requested?
The issue is the wording "Natural Born Citizen" and if that means both his parents need to be citizens of the US vs just the one..
"Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are "natural born Citizens" for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."
If Georgia announces the defendant is off the ballot because hes not qualified, expect a rush appeal to the SCOTUS. This would force the Court to peek at natural born citizen.
Obama will lose.
What on earth leads you to conclude this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe
Let the arrests begin.
Because up to the (imagined) time that SCOTUS declares "natural-born citizen" to require 2 citizen parents, the definition of NBC was either undetermined, fuzzy, or not requiring 2 citizen parents.
So please tell me which law will have been broken.
The defendant's plan all along was avoiding the natural born citizen issue. The defendant was willing to accept the default, he gambled and lost. We presented evidence Obama's not a natural born citizen.
We knew there was no way Obama would come to court to defend he's a natural born citizen. How can he?
The defendant's plan all along was avoiding the natural born citizen issue. The defendant was willing to accept the default, he gambled and lost. We presented evidence Obama's not a natural born citizen.
Oh? He lost? You got a new crystal ball there somewhere DC?
the motion to compel wasn't decided on, prior to the hearing (and no decision by Malihi on that was done). So, no, Jablonski didn't have to show anything because NOTHING required him to do so.
Notice to produce documents are not decided on prior to hearings. They are documents you need to take to the hearing so a decision can be made.
They are rather routine in america, which has me wondering why so many of you guys are uninformed. For example, they are issued to spouses to determine child support payments, forcing spouses to bring the documents to the court hearing so the data can be analized.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
