Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-08-2012, 01:21 PM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,848,638 times
Reputation: 3315

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 313Weather View Post
In other words, you have very poor reading comprehension.
Why is that? The idiots who voted for Obama are pretty drone-ish in addition to be completely moronic for basing their choices on lies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2012, 01:23 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,856 posts, read 24,091,732 times
Reputation: 15123
You know that the police and various other law enforcement agencies already use helicopters and planes, right?

You also know that "unmanned" doesn't mean "pilotless," and that a real person has to fly the drone - just like a real person has to fly a helicopter or plane - right?

This is primarily about cost and safety. No pilot in the air means that a pilot can't fall to earth and die. No pilot also means a lower price for the aircraft.

The only potential issue here is that there might be more aircraft in the air. Other than that (and that's not a big deal, considering how many are already up there), this is much ado about nothing.

You're like the media giants. You fear new technology, and your failure to understand or embrace it is going to destroy you...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2012, 01:46 PM
 
45,201 posts, read 26,417,923 times
Reputation: 24964
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
You know that the police and various other law enforcement agencies already use helicopters and planes, right?

You also know that "unmanned" doesn't mean "pilotless," and that a real person has to fly the drone - just like a real person has to fly a helicopter or plane - right?

This is primarily about cost and safety. No pilot in the air means that a pilot can't fall to earth and die. No pilot also means a lower price for the aircraft.

The only potential issue here is that there might be more aircraft in the air. Other than that (and that's not a big deal, considering how many are already up there), this is much ado about nothing.

You're like the media giants. You fear new technology, and your failure to understand or embrace it is going to destroy you...
No, it will just crash into a school, or a neighborhood,or a park or an apartment building... but hey at least no cop/pilot/tax feeder will be killed

FYI, not having them at all is the cheapest option and we'll be no less safe for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2012, 03:51 PM
 
Location: Planet Eaarth
8,954 posts, read 20,673,069 times
Reputation: 7193
Default Drones over U.S. get OK by Congress

One last bit of privacy just went away.......

Drones over U.S. get OK by Congress - Washington Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2012, 04:15 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,322 posts, read 17,124,630 times
Reputation: 19556
Default The Grand eye...

Of surveillance only increases with advancements in tech, And in time. They have satellites in space as of years ago that can read a license plate on the road. This is not tin-foil hat stuff either. There are advancements that have developed tech that are years ahead.

I personally am not worried about a drone overhead broadcasting me walking around NY with an iced coffee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2012, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
7,085 posts, read 12,050,618 times
Reputation: 4125
Well, why not lead a movement to outlaw the use of drones in the US?

Oh yeah, that would take effort, time, and dedication...and not sitting around ranting on the computer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2012, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,377,473 times
Reputation: 8672
They already do this with airplanes now. I don't see what the difference is.

Cut defense and this kind of crap will go away, but God forbid mentioning that, its unpatriotic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2012, 04:32 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,414,093 times
Reputation: 4190
All that technology is no substitute for boots on the ground.

The intelligence system today is too reliant on two much tech in the hands of to few. It is easily circumvented by the simplest of means.

You smart guys will catch my meaning. I just hope that grammar police guy from the other thread doesn't show up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2012, 04:34 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,377,473 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
All that technology is no substitute for boots on the ground.

The intelligence system today is too reliant on two much tech in the hands of to few. It is easily circumvented by the simplest of means.

You smart guys will catch my meaning. I just hope that grammar police guy from the other thread doesn't show up.
Ask the Army and Marines what air power does for you, anyone who served from 1989 through 1991.

Total war, dominate the skys, clear the ground, advance without resistance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2012, 05:06 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,856 posts, read 24,091,732 times
Reputation: 15123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
No, it will just crash into a school, or a neighborhood,or a park or an apartment building... but hey at least no cop/pilot/tax feeder will be killed
So your position is that if anyone has to die due to an accident, we should maximize the body count. Got it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
FYI, not having them at all is the cheapest option and we'll be no less safe for it.
That opinion is not unreasonable, but it is yours alone. Frankly, I'm glad that the police have helicopters. They're a very effective tool.

This thread was started to spread FUD about the possibility of UAVs being used domestically. My point is that everything they're going to be used for is already being done by manned aircraft, and that the use of UAVs is a logical next step in the evolution of law enforcement. If you're a cop hater and think that every LEO is corrupt, you'll naturally think that they're going to do something nefarious with this new tool. What that is, I have no idea, but it seems that there's a few people on this board that just love to hate cops. It's about as rational as thinking that every Republican is racist or that every Democrat is a socialist. But I guess that kind of thinking is par for the course around here...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top