Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I wasn't aware he was in control of every local news organization. Where does that man find the time?
He's also in control of all the local schools, as well as their busses (remember Limbaugh's "Obama's America" on the kid who was beat up on the bus?) and while he's doing all that he's also running Acorn
Was Obama himself at that school? Was it him personally that took away the kid's lunch? No, he wasn't. Did he give the order? Was he in the White House Situation room amidst a bevy of high ranking officials and he was asked for his OK to take the lunch? No he wasn't.
And yet the very same people who claim he doesn't get credit for killing bin Laden because it wasn't him personally that pulled the trigger have no problem at all blaming him for this
Bruce Alexander, director of communications and governmental affairs with the USDA, said Wednesday the person inspecting lunches was a “North Carolina Education staff member conducting a review of the child care center.”
“The school thought it had been resolved, apologized to the parent and never charged the parent for a school meal,” he said
Quote:
Originally Posted by quigboto
Wanting to know the whole story is nay-saying? Why would you say that? Don't you want to know the whole story before making a judgement? Or are you happy to just fill in the blanks so you can shake your fist at imaginary villains?
The article is riddled with inconsistencies that could be cleared up without disclosing the child's name. Her lunch wasn't confiscated. She brought it home uneaten.
Also, Chicago does not do the same thing. There is a school in Chicago that does not allow outside lunches to be brought in (a policy that I think is rather heavy handed, and worth getting indignant about) Apparently you are pretty comfortable making things up to fill in the blanks.
Bruce Alexander, director of communications and governmental affairs with the USDA, said Wednesday the person inspecting lunches was a “North Carolina Education staff member conducting a review of the child care center.”
“The school thought it had been resolved, apologized to the parent and never charged the parent for a school meal,” he said
Still doesn't explain why her lunch was uneaten. Or exactly what about it was deemed nutritionally deficient enough to be replaced with chicken nuggets.
Also, you incorrectly stated that Chicago is doing this, when it's a single school in Chicago doing this.
Still doesn't explain why her lunch was uneaten. Or exactly what about it was deemed nutritionally deficient enough to be replaced with chicken nuggets.
Also, you incorrectly stated that Chicago is doing this, when it's a single school in Chicago doing this.
It does not have to stated why her lunch was eaten. That is irrelevant. The fact is, that this did happen it pokes your accusations all to pot.
Just like NC, chicago has guidelines.....it is a state issue.
This story is STILL wholly dependent upon the word of a single person...that reporter. She has not offered one shred of evidence to support her claim it actually happened and nobody has been able to track down this phantom Mom, Grandma or state inspector.
And OMG, what a crappy reporter she is. A quote from the Fox News Insider web article:
Quote:
Burrows said that it still isn’t clear who the inspector was who deemed this little girl’s lunch was unhealthy
She based an entire story on one person's action, and she "isn't clear" on who that person is? Where are the two sides to the story? This reporter has zero credibility.
The Journal initially reported that a state agent was inspecting lunchboxes in a West Hoke Elementary School ‘More at Four’ classroom. The report has since been edited and no longer reads that it was a state agent but a “person who was inspecting lunches.”
If I were her editor, I'd fire that reporter for these egregious fabrications and errors. She obviously has no idea how to do her job.
Your opinion on the reporting style is irrelevant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81
And OMG, what a crappy reporter she is. A quote from the Fox News Insider web article:
She based an entire story on one person's action, and she "isn't clear" on who that person is? Where are the two sides to the story? This reporter has zero credibility.
More evidence of outrageously horrible reporting:
If I were her editor, I'd fire that reporter for these egregious fabrications and errors. She obviously has no idea how to do her job.
You know what really ****ing amazes me is how I got to be 6'3" 250lbs of scary man machine on the peanut butter and jelly sandwiches I grew up eating in my sack lunches. Jeez friggin Louise.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
