Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There are many people who work for catholic universities, hospitals, etc., that are not catholic. They have a right to have BC covered, like everyone else.
The business has a right to offer what they want to. Those people who work for a religious org that aren't religious and don't like the rules are free to work somewhere else too.
There are many people who work for catholic universities, hospitals, etc., that are not catholic. They have a right to have BC covered, like everyone else.
...just where is it a "right" to force others to pay for your birth control pill? I must have missed that day in history class when we studied that part of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
You are an angry little girl I see. Women can still have sex without BC pills. Viagra is NOT a contraceptive, condoms are for men. That's the equivalent to women's BC pills. Don't get all twisted over an apples to oranges comparison. Women can have all the sex they want, but when they are irresponsible or to horny and can't say no when their partner doesn't have a condom, dig deep into your pockets when you want that abortion baby!
Or simply buy their own da*m box of condoms if they're partners are too stupid to do so. Seems pretty simple, doesn't it? The usual entitlement mentality...I want, I want, I want...just so long as someone else pays.
The business has a right to offer what they want to. Those people who work for a religious org that aren't religious and don't like the rules are free to work somewhere else too.
It's two different things. This whole thing started with a religious argument that contraceptives are banned by the church. The only argument is about the religious aspect. Not Male vs. Female.
The church believes that no one should use contraception to prevent a pregnancy. A man who is unable to get hard would take Viagra in order to have sex to get his wife pregnant so the church sees no problem with it. The whole thing is about religion and a women not being allowed to prevent pregnancies. Are men allowed to get vasectomies? If yes then you have an argument. If not then VIAGRA IS NOT AN ARGUMENT.
This is coming from someone who thinks it should be covered but from a medical perspective not a "so I can bang who ever I want" perspective.
If they get their HC from a religious org, then they will have to pay for it or use something else.
So,why can't men who need Viagra do the same?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
