Breaking: Mississippi Supreme Court Appoints Special Judge To Preside Over Obama Ballot Challenge (elections, elect)

[banjomike]

Originally Posted by wrecking ball

if you're going to photoshop you might want to seek out more obscure reference than the official senate photo.

Robert Byrd - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Now that's FUNNY, right there! Usually the giveaway is harder to find! Just goes to show birther photoshoppers are no smarter than their lawyers.

I made part of my living Photoshopping, and once a person really takes a look, and knows a few things, it's always easy to spot a goof.

That Kluxer goof's giveaways:
- different lighting on the face than all the rest.
- Byrd's head looked too small; the shoulders are of a much bigger and burlier man.
- A person's face and hands are almost always the same size. The hand in the shot is bigger than the face. Just put a hand on your face, and you will instantly understand this.

Thanks for the find, wrecking ball. Debunking this crap is a sport among those who know the Photoshop program well.

[Steve McGarrett]

Originally Posted by banjomike

By the time it's amended with the correct title and rescheduled (if the CC judge even permits this), the election may well be over. Just goes to show birther lawyers are as dumb as their clients. Chalk another fail up for Ms. Taitz!

.

No, when the ballot challenges are filed, they have to be resolved before the primary.

[chielgirl]

Oh, no!
Another oily titz thread.

Give it up, birfer.

[monkeywrenching]

Originally Posted by Lucidkitty

And the federal district judge will then strike this down. So this is a great use of your tax dollars at work

they might strike down something, but it is up to the states to have qualified people on their ballots. there is nothing a federal judge can do here.

the feds cannot force the states to put someone on a ballot that the state thinks is unqualified.

[wrecking ball]

Originally Posted by monkeywrenching

the feds cannot force the states to put someone on a ballot that the state thinks is unqualified.

nor can states deny an eligible candidate from the ballot.

all the current challenges are just recycling the same arguments from the georgia hearing. there's nothing to indicate that the outcome will be different.

[twinArmageddons]

Hey look. More waste of taxpayer money.

What'll they do when they lose this one too?

[DC at the Ridge]

Originally Posted by monkeywrenching

they might strike down something, but it is up to the states to have qualified people on their ballots. there is nothing a federal judge can do here.

the feds cannot force the states to put someone on a ballot that the state thinks is unqualified.

The feds aren't forcing anything.

The Democratic Party is not a government entity. Political parties are private organizations that serve a public purpose. PRIVATE.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by Steve McGarrett

No, when the ballot challenges are filed, they have to be resolved before the primary.

And if they are improperly filed, to include being filed against organizations that do not exist, they are resolved by either rejecting them or ignoring them.

[monkeywrenching]

Originally Posted by wrecking ball

nor can states deny an eligible candidate from the ballot.

all the current challenges are just recycling the same arguments from the georgia hearing. there's nothing to indicate that the outcome will be different.

very true, but it is up to state election laws and the courts in that state can decide if a person is eligible or not.

[monkeywrenching]

Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge

The feds aren't forcing anything.

The Democratic Party is not a government entity. Political parties are private organizations that serve a public purpose. PRIVATE.

strange, i did not mention either the democrat or republican party in my statement.