The problem with unions. (Maine, Arizona, Connecticut, job)

[Darkatt]

10 states that cannot pay their bills...

Ten States That Cannot Pay Their Bills | Fox Business

1. New Hampshire, Not a right to work state.

2. Connecticut, Not a right to work state.

3. Washington, Not a right to work state.

4. North Carolina, right to work state.

5.Vermont, Not a right to work

6. Maine, Not a right to work

7. New Jersey, Not a right to work

8. Arizona, Right to work

9. Illinois, Not a right to work

10. Nevada, Right to work

7 out of 10 states that cannot pay their bills are not right to work states. Right to work states have a higher standard of living, and a lower cost of living.

[Ghostrider275452]

Originally Posted by Darkatt

10 states that cannot pay their bills...

Ten States That Cannot Pay Their Bills | Fox Business

1. New Hampshire, Not a right to work state.

2. Connecticut, Not a right to work state.

3. Washington, Not a right to work state.

4. North Carolina, right to work state.

5.Vermont, Not a right to work

6. Maine, Not a right to work

7. New Jersey, Not a right to work

8. Arizona, Right to work

9. Illinois, Not a right to work

10. Nevada, Right to work

7 out of 10 states that cannot pay their bills are not right to work states. Right to work states have a higher standard of living, and a lower cost of living.

What is your point?

[Just a Bill]

Originally Posted by Camlon

I am quite sure that if the employer is being a jerk, then most workers would be perfectly willing to pay the union dues.

My point has always been that it is unnecessary and revolting to force people to pay union dues, even though they don't want representation. That is the way unions become unpopular.

Hey, genius, if I need to attend to REAL life for a day or two, it doesn't mean that I am forever off your radar, and that you have won the debate de facto, and don't you forget it. My family being fed comes before arguing with ignoramuses who abandon their homelands for monetary interests.

drøm søtt.

[Camlon]

Originally Posted by Just a Bill

Hey, genius, if I need to attend to REAL life for a day or two, it doesn't mean that I am forever off your radar, and that you have won the debate de facto, and don't you forget it. My family being fed comes before arguing with ignoramuses who abandon their homelands for monetary interests.

drøm søtt.

lol, I love how fixated you are on me.

I still won the debate about unions, and you didn't just leave. You said that you will not respond to me anymore.

[Just a Bill]

Originally Posted by Camlon

lol, I love how fixated you are on me.

I still won the debate about unions, and you didn't just leave. You said that you will not respond to me anymore.

Se deg selv i speilet.

[Darkatt]

Originally Posted by Ghostrider275452

What is your point?

Really? You could not comprehend the point?

23 out of 50 states have right to work laws. 7 out of 10 states is a disproportionate number of states being unable to make their budget.

Right to work states have a lower cost of living, and a higher standard of living, requires no explanation, at least I would not think it would...

[Glitch]

Originally Posted by Ghostrider275452

Those two are a wonderful and unbias source.

And enlightening.

"Well, then, to carry out the principles of socialism do its believers advocate assassination and bloodshed?"

"No great movement," Karl answered, "has ever been inaugurated Without Bloodshed."

Source: Interview with Karl Marx, Chicago Tribune, January 5, 1879


It explains the SEIU, Teamsters, and other union violence.

[Ghostrider275452]

Originally Posted by Glitch

And enlightening.




Source: Interview with Karl Marx, Chicago Tribune, January 5, 1879


It explains the SEIU, Teamsters, and other union violence.

And it all worked so well in the Soviet Union.

[Ghostrider275452]

Originally Posted by Darkatt

Really? You could not comprehend the point?

23 out of 50 states have right to work laws. 7 out of 10 states is a disproportionate number of states being unable to make their budget.

Right to work states have a lower cost of living, and a higher standard of living, requires no explanation, at least I would not think it would...

What does this have to do with unions?

[Glitch]

Originally Posted by Ghostrider275452

And it all worked so well in the Soviet Union.

Exactly. We have the benefit of hindsight. Armed with the knowledge that socialism has always proven to be a dismal failure in the past, we can confidentially predict the future outcome of unions since they are intertwined.