Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because guys secure with their sexuality are not phased by 2 other guys kissing. My obscenely straight coworker kissed me on a dare. And no he's not even remotely close to being gay, he's obsessed with women and has a family.
He's just VERY secure with his sexuality and is not phased by gays.
People like you are obviously very insecure and have to demonize gay people to somehow validate your sexuality and convince yourself you don't have hidden same-sex attractions.
This is so true. To a straight guy, kissing another man is like kissing a door knob. It doesn't phase them, one way or another because it doesn't do a nything for them. They're not afraid of it because their attraction to and obsession of women outweighs everything. Others who are not truely attracted to women are in fact in afraid of it. Hence, the term homophobic is validated. Common sense.
This is so true. To a straight guy, kissing another man is like kissing a door knob. It doesn't phase them, one way or another because it doesn't do a nything for them. They're not afraid of it because their attraction to and obsession of women outweighs everything. Others who are not truely attracted to women are in fact in afraid of it. Hence, the term homophobic is validated. Common sense.
I wouldn't know since I don't plan on kissing another guy. I'm not afraid of it because I'm not going to do it.
So I'm not truly attracted to women because I don't want to kiss a guy?
Unless he doesn't know how to get his point across, I think I interpreted it correctly.
There was a slight ambiguity, but not enough to cover what you are trying to say. He did not indicate that straight men go around kissing other men as a matter of routine.
There was a slight ambiguity, but not enough to cover what you are trying to say. He did not indicate that straight men go around kissing other men as a matter of routine.
Slight? It's yet another invocation of Shakespeare's famous non-sequitur line "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."
There was a slight ambiguity, but not enough to cover what you are trying to say. He did not indicate that straight men go around kissing other men as a matter of routine.
"Others who are not truely attracted to women are in fact in afraid of it. Hence, the term homophobic is validated."
How I interpret this is, if I decline/do not accept or am afraid to kiss a guy that I could possibly be gay.
If that's not what hes trying to get across then it needs to be rephrased.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
