Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Again, you only read the parts selectively instead of as a whole. Kindly note the part which references you.
Nothing makes sense when one encounters a genuinely obstructive person.
One never expects to find irrational behaviour but a corrective measure is to never coddle which only enables that person to continue their behavior. I know you will eventually go to the site and search or register if you truly wish to learn about this subject and not sit in ignorance. And then perhaps you will not if you genuinely are close minded.
You my friend, have diarrhea of the keyboard. Your posts were a complete waste of time. You posted a link which led to a book on Amazon. Classic trolling.
Again, you only read the parts selectively instead of as a whole. Kindly note the part which references you.
Nothing makes sense when one encounters a genuinely obstructive person.
One never expects to find irrational behaviour but a corrective measure is to never coddle which only enables that person to continue their behavior. I know you will eventually go to the site and search or register if you truly wish to learn about this subject and not sit in ignorance. And then perhaps you will not if you genuinely are close minded.
Based on your CONTINUED obstructiveness ... you should just cease it now.
No. I am just taking the opportunity to show the OP has no knowledge or inclination to know about this topic outside of what he saw in some videos. Those who mocked him I recognize as regulars in POC forum who take the opportunity to expose this sort of thing. I showed the OP where he could find the information. He was truculent and there it began and now you have insinuated yourself into the discussion.
So now we're playing Hansel and Gretel ... follow the bread crumbs back to grandma's house?
Jesus ... this entire thread is 80% insults, back and forth quips, diversions, and very little adult debate involving facts ... and you have not demonstrated yourself tyo be the 20% exception.
No. I am just taking the opportunity to show the OP has no knowledge or inclination to know about this topic outside of what he saw in some videos. Those who mocked him I recognize as regulars in POC forum who take the opportunity to expose this sort of thing. I showed the OP where he could find the information. He was truculent and there it began and now you have insinuated yourself into the discussion.
The regulars you refer to are the regular juveniles who take this approach to every thread.
Since this is a "Controversies" forum, if you don't like controversies, or you don't think they deserve legitimate discussion, go back to history, and take the children with you.
So now we're playing Hansel and Gretel ... follow the bread crumbs back to grandma's house?
Jesus ... this entire thread is 80% insults, back and forth quips, diversions, and very little adult debate involving facts ... and you have not demonstrated yourself tyo be the 20% exception.
Stop it. YOU are interfering with honest debate.
It seems they have no desire to debate. The evidence was shocking to thier system thus it led to thier trolling.
What debate? That the OP saw some videos and decided to post something "new" in the POC forum of City-Data? I already wrote that conspiracy theorists will place aside all objections to their new found theory. Perhaps only reading from the genuine experts themselves will cure this sickness.
I only entered when the OP mentioned the colors of the rockets. Which on the face my appear as a point to expose in 201x but not one in the period in question. Someone actually pointed out the contrary sources to oppose this theory much earlier than I did in this thread and they were ignored.
You call that an honest debate? You and the OP who obviously know nothing regarding the Titanic? Well enjoy your debate.
What debate? That the OP saw some videos and decided to post something "new" in the POC forum of City-Data? I already wrote that conspiracy theorists will place aside all objections to their new found theory. Perhaps only reading from the genuine experts themselves will cure this sickness.
I only entered when the OP mentioned the colors of the rockets. Which on the face my appear as a point to expose in 201x but not one in the period in question.
Someone actually pointed out the contrary factfinding to oppose this theory much earlier than I did in this thread and they were ignored.
You call that an honest debate? You and the OP who obviously know nothing regarding the Titanic?
Suddenly you have become the authority on the "Titanic"? When new information which was not available say 20 years ago is presented. You somehow feel threatened and become infuriated. Why is that? I see that a lot on these forums from the same usual suspects.
Suddenly you have become the authority on the "Titanic"? When new information which was not available say 20 years ago is presented. You somehow feel threatened and become infuriated. Why is that? I see that a lot on these forums from the same usual suspects.
No authority and I have written so repeatedly hence the reason for providing the link to the titanic research website. This is the fourth/fifth occasion I have mentioned this to you.
This is a theory which has been about for some years and completely debunked by experts current in the field.
Not threatened or infuriated (come on it is the Internet) but do see you as unwilling to learn from the experts as so much data is available to warrant cross examining your initial posting subject.
Well POC is somehow the blue light district of City-Data.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.