Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But there is supposed to be a video somewhere that shows Obama meeting with members of the Weather Underground during his college days.
"Supposed to" is vital here: the Weather Underground disbanded in '73,
as their primary motivation was ending the Viet Nam war. President Obama was born in 1961, making him 12 when TWU dissolved. He may be a smart cookie, but he wasn't at either Occidental or Harvard at 12. Even if I use my imagination and create a scenario whereby he met with a group of former Weather Underground members while researching a paper, why the heck would anyone be filming it?
"Supposed to" is vital here: the Weather Underground disbanded in '73,
as their primary motivation was ending the Viet Nam war. President Obama was born in 1961, making him 12 when TWU dissolved. He may be a smart cookie, but he wasn't at either Occidental or Harvard at 12. Even if I use my imagination and create a scenario whereby he met with a group of former Weather Underground members while researching a paper, why the heck would anyone be filming it?
I see you know nothing about computers ... figures
Like Big Jon, you both show that you fail reading comprehension 101
SSN # blasted to the world via internet
1000 people see that number and goes to the link also blasted to the world via the internet (usually in the same freaking article)
All 1000 people, input the same number at the link
system says "too many tries.. you exceeded daily limit...try again later"
What part of this do you both not get?
It TOTALED up all the tries from the 1000 people who did the look up based on the SSN. So if you did it 1000 times or 1000 people did 1 time each, ITS all the same to the system.
It doesn't calculate by IP. It calculates based on how many times the number is looked up in a day.
Gee whiz. My 7 year old nephew understands better than you two.
I agree - the anti-birthers are the most close minded group of individuals I have come across in a long time. What is interesting is they say they have been "on top" of this issue since its birth (pun intended) and are entirely obsessed with something they say is nonsense. When someone like myself who is just exploring the issue states that I am approaching this with an open mind - they immediately go into shutdown mode and come close to dismissing anyone who would try to research the birther claim for veracity as a birther themself.
It probally comes down to this - people are afraid to have there views challenged.
I don't know about that. It's pretty much standard procedure. This is nothing new - shut down discussion of issue X by calling conservatives Y:
They have nothing legitimate to say on abortion they just want to control women.
They have nothing legitimate to say on affirmative action they are just racist.
They have nothing legitimate to say on welfare they're just rich & greedy.
And now it's the birth certificate can't be fake, they're just crazy birthers. That's just how it works with some liberals.
I told you. If IP addresses were a communal thing then CD mods couldn't ban one person, they'd ban entire communes of internet users because one person decided to use multiple handles.
This is also at this point a complete red herring, and your refusal to answer the question shows that you know I've proven the website is keying off the president's SSN and not your IP adress.
At a minimum, if we're going to be subjected to these racist birther hoax threads couldn't we at least have them combined into a single unit? We can call it "Racists' KKKorner" or something like that.
Why does race always have to enter the discussion? It is not the black president I disagree with, it is the socialist dictator lying president that I disagree with.
Why does race always have to enter the discussion? It is not the black president I disagree with, it is the socialist dictator lying president that I disagree with.
Ridiculous hyperbole aside, what does that still have to do with the "birther" issue?
Do birthers not understand that trying the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is the definition of madness?
Why does race always have to enter the discussion? It is not the black president I disagree with, it is the socialist dictator lying president that I disagree with.
Certainly you would not pretend that, just because you are not racist, that none of the opposition to this president is racist.
Would you?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
