Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-06-2012, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
Insurance companies that my mother (and I, and thousands of other women) pay into are public money now?
May be Gunner is using public money for healthcare needs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-06-2012, 01:13 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,145 posts, read 6,531,599 times
Reputation: 1754
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Nice one here...

"Rush Limbaugh is a Prostitute Who Will Do Anything With His Mouth for Cash"
- Stephen Colbert
Colbert is a republican you know
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2012, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by enemy country View Post
Colbert is a republican you know
Yep. He's a "Real Conservative".


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2012, 01:14 PM
 
Location: MO
2,122 posts, read 3,686,986 times
Reputation: 1462
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
Insurance companies that my mother (and I, and thousands of other women) pay into are public money now?
No, they're not. Medicaid is however and if this so called "Requirement for private insurance to cover contraception" were to be implemented what makes you think that Medicaid wouldn't end up covering it as well? Many states have a Medicaid system where the individuals who are enrolled in Medicaid are through a private health plan that the state helps pay for.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
May be Gunner is using public money for healthcare needs.
Nope. I pay for my protection myself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2012, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Camberville
15,861 posts, read 21,441,250 times
Reputation: 28204
Quote:
Originally Posted by GunnerTHB View Post
No, they're not. Medicaid is however and if this so called "Requirement for private insurance to cover contraception" were to be implemented what makes you think that Medicaid wouldn't end up covering it as well? Many states have a Medicaid system where the individuals who are enrolled in Medicaid are through a private health plan that the state helps pay for.
But why do you assume that any woman is on Medicaid? In particular, I think it would be in Medicaid's best interest to pay for contraception versus the costs (and lifetime costs) of pregnancy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2012, 01:24 PM
 
665 posts, read 1,243,571 times
Reputation: 364
Laura Ingraham insulted Megan Mccain about her weight. She is a bomb thrower and she should expect
to get bomb thrown back at her. Now ed did step over the line,but that is not the same as Rush attacking a college student for respectfully advocating her position and not throwing bombs is a completely diferent thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2012, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Old Town Alexandria
14,492 posts, read 26,594,973 times
Reputation: 8971
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
Wears mom jeans.
What a brilliant post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2012, 01:27 PM
 
Location: MO
2,122 posts, read 3,686,986 times
Reputation: 1462
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
But why do you assume that any woman is on Medicaid? In particular, I think it would be in Medicaid's best interest to pay for contraception versus the costs (and lifetime costs) of pregnancy.
I think it's a pretty safe assumption that out of all the people in the nation that receive Medicaid, at least one of them is female.....

I've thought about the second part of your statement before and I do not like the idea of taxpayer money being used for contraception personally. (And no it has no basis in my mind on religious grounds. I keep my religion separate from my politics) I don't feel like contraception is a necessary component of an insurance plan, and therefore I don't think a Medicaid plan should cover it. Now if a private insurance company wants to offer it as part of their plan, I'm all for it, and if a private insurance company doesn't want to offer it, I'm all for that too.
If someone considers it to be an important component of any insurance plan, then they should pick an insurance plan that offers it.

I strongly believe that any mandate of any type will raise insurance prices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2012, 01:28 PM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,975,567 times
Reputation: 16155
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
My 50 year old mother (who has not hit menopause yet) has been on birth control since my brother was born 22 years ago. She's only ever had one partner - my dad, who she has been married to for 30 years. The pill is quite expensive for her to pay for on a very limited income. Is she a **** too?
No, she's not. But if she expects me to pay for it, instead of herself or your dad, she's a taker.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2012, 01:29 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by GunnerTHB View Post
No, they're not. Medicaid is however and if this so called "Requirement for private insurance to cover contraception" were to be implemented what makes you think that Medicaid wouldn't end up covering it as well? Many states have a Medicaid system where the individuals who are enrolled in Medicaid are through a private health plan that the state helps pay for.
That was a quick turn around from public money to private and for sake of convenience. Perhaps I'm missing something... how exactly does the requirement that private insurance must cover this, this and this (in other words a baseline) become "public money" because private health care providers engage in providing service to people covered by Medicare or Medicaid?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GunnerTHB View Post
I think it's a pretty safe assumption that out of all the people in the nation that receive Medicaid, at least one of them is female.....
But she would be on Medicaid. What has the minimum set for private insurance providers got to do with it? While at it, do share if you believe that birth control wasn't a part of any insurance until now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top