Same-sex parenting harms children (family, support, homosexuals)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I bet Focus on the Family never apologizes or correct their distortions. If they did, there would be too much risk in upsetting their bigoted supporters so much that they would stop sending money.
Good point StillwaterTownie!
Who do you suppose funds the US National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study?
Maybe it's the same lesbian mothers who volunteered for the study and then gave themselves high marks.
"Between 1986 and 1992, 154 prospective lesbian mothers volunteered for a study that was designed to follow planned lesbian families from the index children's conception until they reached adulthood."
"According to their mothers' reports, the 17-year-old daughters and sons of lesbian mothers were rated significantly higher in social, school/academic, and total competence and significantly lower in social problems, rule-breaking, aggressive, and externalizing problem behavior than their age-matched counterparts in Achenbach's normative sample of American youth."
If that's all it takes for gay-haters to declare gays to be bad parents, then surely these same people must believe that blacks shouldn't be parents either.
If that's all it takes for gay-haters to declare gays to be bad parents, then surely these same people must believe that blacks shouldn't be parents either.
Still trying to hitch a ride on the Civil Rights Movement?
A lot of blacks spent time in jail and far worse so they could vote and send their kids to school.
Hijacking their efforts in an attempt to normalize gay sex is crass at best.
When you talk as they did in the article, you're going beyond giving your opinion into passing that opinion off as scientific fact. "Studies", "findings", "research". These are words used when you want to make a claim, not merely give an opinion.
Using an elaborate, long-winded article in which they talked as if their "expert" had any credibility to comment on studies conducted by actual experts (you know, people with a Psy.D, an MA in Sociology, Ph.D, M.D., heck even a Sc.D. would work). They threw in scientific words to push an agenda. I'll wait for this "analysis" to be replicated by a neutral, credible party, before I believe any of it. But I really must say, if girls are having more homosexual encounters than heterosexual, there is some good in that. Fewer teen pregnancies? At most, this study shows that education needs to include the risks of being sexually active too young and too casually. And I do believe we'll get there, once some of you stop focusing on gays and start focusing on casual, unprotected sex.
Oh yeah, and those who are against men being gay might wanna leave lesbians alone:
"The NLLFS (National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study) adolescent boys were significantly less likely to have been heterosexually active by the age of 17 thanthe NSFG Cycle 6 boys, but no more likely to have engaged in same-sex sexual contact"
Since you're against homosexuals adopting children, tell us how the law is supposed to confirm someone is a homosexual, if the homosexual refuses to admit to it?
This is more homosexual nonsense. Just like your studies of grading yourselves.
Oh yes it arouses me alright. It arouses me to go too the toilet and throw my guts up. It is that disgusting. And you people are sick to think any normal man wants anything to do with your lifestyle.
Maybe there's something similar to a breathalyzer - a "gayalizer?"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.