Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Republicans who are trying to Impeach Obama are idiots! In case they haven't noticed President Obama was a professor & Constitutional Lawyer at Harvard so the man obviously knows what his "Constitutional" limits are!
I digress though as Republicans will use anything to stop a President (blue stained dress) when they aren't in control.
I hope not. Impeachment would only weaken a nation. I don't like his policies but I can't think of anything he's done that warrants impeachment. The country is divided enough. We either vote him out or we don't. That's democracy.
The Republicans who are trying to Impeach Obama are idiots! In case they haven't noticed President Obama was a professor & Constitutional Lawyer at Harvard so the man obviously knows what his "Constitutional" limits are!
I digress though as Republicans will use anything to stop a President (blue stained dress) when they aren't in control.
what the republicans should do if they want to impeach obama is rather than impeach him, do a censure of obama.
The Republicans who are trying to Impeach Obama are idiots! In case they haven't noticed President Obama was a professor & Constitutional Lawyer at Harvard so the man obviously knows what his "Constitutional" limits are!
I digress though as Republicans will use anything to stop a President (blue stained dress) when they aren't in control.
Knowing what limits are and abiding by them are 2 different things. Obama said he wouldn't use signing statements, but he has. He said he wouldn't do an end run around congress, but he has been.
If you are going to declare war you need to go to congress not act like the UN and Nato is where the action is. I don't think wars should be labeled something else and then executed by any Pres, D or R.
No matter where this info comes from the bill has been introduced to be a Joint Resolution. It seems that this one representative has had a bellyful of breaches of the Constitution with the proclamation by Leon Panetta just last week that the administration would look to the UN an NATO for support to attack any nation in the near future and then come to the Congress after the international permission. They have just gone to far in their avoidance of the Constitution, this time.
No matter where this info comes from the bill has been introduced to be a Joint Resolution. It seems that this one representative has had a bellyful of breaches of the Constitution with the proclamation by Leon Panetta just last week that the administration would look to the UN an NATO for support to attack any nation in the near future and then come to the Congress after the international permission. They have just gone to far in their avoidance of the Constitution, this time.
Lord, its not an Obama impeachment bill. You really need to read your own links. It is a bill that would open any president up for impeachment should he use force in the future without the concent on congress. It's a good bill that could probably come back and bite a Republican president in the butt seeing how some republicans are already calling for military strikes on Syria.
"While it is legitimate for a president to issue a signing statement to clarify his understanding of ambiguous provisions of statutes and to explain his view of how he intends to faithfully execute the law, it is a clear abuse of power to use such statements as a license to evade laws that the president does not like or as an end-run around provisions designed to foster accountability. I will not use signing statements to nullify or undermine congressional instructions as enacted into law."
"While it is legitimate for a president to issue a signing statement to clarify his understanding of ambiguous provisions of statutes and to explain his view of how he intends to faithfully execute the law, it is a clear abuse of power to use such statements as a license to evade laws that the president does not like or as an end-run around provisions designed to foster accountability. I will not use signing statements to nullify or undermine congressional instructions as enacted into law."
Sen Barak Obama; Boston Globe, Dec. 20, 2007
so ovcatto, does this mean according to obamas own words, did he commit an impeachable offence?
The Republicans who are trying to Impeach Obama are idiots! In case they haven't noticed President Obama was a professor & Constitutional Lawyer at Harvard so the man obviously knows what his "Constitutional" limits are!
I digress though as Republicans will use anything to stop a President (blue stained dress) when they aren't in control.
It was much more than a blue stained dress. It was lying under oath (perjury), witness tampering and obstructing justice.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
