Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So why is running his trap about the Trayvon Martin case?
Obama is all about Obama. Pick and choose, wisely we can see, and we can see just which ones, he inserts himself in. Wonder why.
I think we know the reason why?
Of course not. They saw a guy trying to get into a house without a key. I appeared to the cop this person was breaking into a house. When he asked the home owner for identification, the home owner refused. The cop did everything right, the professor was a confrontational jerk.
That is not what happened.
I've read the police report.
The arrested him after verifying that it was his residence.
Lol, that's exactly what I said, the Professir was attempting to enter the house without the benefit of a key. Instead of producing evidence that he was the homeowner he chose confrontation.
Shoddy police work, making the cops look dumb.
So, what about the case in your OP is reflective of a controversy? What should Obama have written to the English family? How should he have been involved?
The truth is that there was nothing for him to say or do. A tragedy for the family, no doubt. The perp is serving life w/o parole. There are no loose ends or police-centered point of contention.
And I simply want a date with Brooke Shields. Yet she persists in deciding on her own who she wishes to associate with, so unreasonable.
That of course makes no sense.
Obama is a world leader, who picks and chooses which events to comment on. It just so happens that he only comments on situations that benefit him politically.
So, what about the case in your OP is reflective of a controversy? What should Obama have written to the English family? How should he have been involved?
The truth is that there was nothing for him to say or do. A tragedy for the family, no doubt. The perp is serving life w/o parole. There are no loose ends or police-centered point of contention.
Clearly it was exemplary police work. And the professor was spoiling for a fight.
It certainly would not have cost the President anything to respond to their letter. He chose not too. It is clear he chose not to, because there was no political benefit to him.
Clearly it was exemplary police work. And the professor was spoiling for a fight.
It certainly would not have cost the President anything to respond to their letter. He chose not too. It is clear he chose not to, because there was no political benefit to him.
Then maybe you should start a nasty thread filled with phony outrage.
Obama is a world leader, who picks and chooses which events to comment on. It just so happens that he only comments on situations that benefit him politically.
Is there proof that he even saw the letter? Do you know how many letters are received daily? Do you have any idea how many hands they go through?
Do you know how many actually end up in his hands?
OR...are you just assuming that since letters were sent, that they went right through to his desk, and were given high priority?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
