Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Chelsea who? Isn't she the kid who got a college degree without attending all her classes and a six-figure starting salary at a hedge fund as a consultant with ZERO experience because her name was "Clinton".
You think the Bush twins would have gotten anywhere on their own? Hell you think George Bush himself would be anything without Daddy?
This was a tasteless comment by Limbaugh from I think nearly 20 years ago. And Limbaugh profusely apologized at the time, realizing that he had gone over the line.
I think this is a good example for the 'partisanship making us stupid' thread. Here's a ill-considered, and rather meaningless comment, apologized for, and twenty years later people are still discussing and dissecting it. Ah well I must admire all these Limbaugh critics, who apparently have NEVER made an ill-considered remark in their lives.
To be fair to the OP, he didn't dredge up Rush's 20 year old statement. He was just commenting on Chelsea finally addressing it (as an adult) all these years later. That report is a new event.
To be fair to the OP, he didn't dredge up Rush's 20 year old statement. He was just commenting on Chelsea finally addressing it (as an adult) all these years later. That report is a new event.
A new event? Is there some nuance and complexity to the 'dog' comment such that Chelsea's adult mind was required? Some new insight that the 13-yr-old Chelsea could not have supplied?
Chelsea who? Isn't she the kid who got a college degree without attending all her classes and a six-figure starting salary at a hedge fund as a consultant with ZERO experience because her name was "Clinton".
that has what to do with the pill popping slob call her a dog?
A new event? Is there some nuance and complexity to the 'dog' comment such that Chelsea's adult mind was required? Some new insight that the 13-yr-old Chelsea could not have supplied?
The "new event" meaning that she was recently participating in a discussion and the previous incident was brought up when discussing the Fluke incident.
Your previous post alluded to the fact that this was just being dredged up for no reason. The OP brought it up because of a recent discussion involving Chelsea Clinton on the whole matter. I agree that "we" don't need to keep dredging up Rush's past comments; however, if the subject matter of Fluke and Rush is being discussed and Chelsea Clinton happens to be there, it is totally appropriate for HER to bring it up. It would be relevent to that particular conversation.
Do you really think this is new from either party?
We can discuss the Kennedy family, the Gore family and I am sure if I tried real hard I could find other repubs.
I would think that by bring the other party into the equation I was showing that I know it happens on both sides.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
