Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is the mantra that the evolutionists always repeat so that they can shut down debate - after all if evolution is the foundation of modern biology then how can anyone argue against it?
The problem is that this is not absolutely true and the robots who repeat the mantra never bother defending their position.
Something does not become true just because you say it enough times.
Prove it.
Prove that evolution is not the basis of modern biology.
This is the mantra that the evolutionists always repeat so that they can shut down debate - after all if evolution is the foundation of modern biology then how can anyone argue against it?
The problem is that this is not absolutely true and the robots who repeat the mantra never bother defending their position.
Something does not become true just because you say it enough times.
Absolutely right! Most other "civilized" countries have realized that religion is BS around the 1950's- This country is only about 60 years behind the rest of the civilized world!
95% of the US population believe there is a "God".
88% of the World's population believes there is a "God"
No it isn't - this thread is about discussing the merits of teaching creation and evolution. Jaymax called creationism a myth - I called evolution a myth.
I happen to believe that neither belong in a public classroom. Biology classes should consist of natural history - with no mention of origins.
Evolutionists dislike that - because it gives them no place to propagate their myth.
Only the "myth" of evolution actually has evidence (fossil records, DNA, genetic testing) that support it. It meets the tests of science. Whereas the "myth" of creationism has no evidence to support it. The only support for creationism comes from faith in a book written long ago. The "myth" of evolution, like any scientific theory, is constantly adjusting itself to fit new evidence, new facts that come to light. Whereas, if you subscribe to the "myth" of creationism, you have to constantly adjust the facts to fit your beliefs.
Fundamental differences which make one a religion, and the other science.
Science should be taught in science classrooms. Religion has no place in science classrooms.
Only the "myth" of evolution actually has evidence (fossil records, DNA, genetic testing) that support it. It meets the tests of science. Whereas the "myth" of creationism has no evidence to support it. The only support for creationism comes from faith in a book written long ago. The "myth" of evolution, like any scientific theory, is constantly adjusting itself to fit new evidence, new facts that come to light. Whereas, if you subscribe to the "myth" of creationism, you have to constantly adjust the facts to fit your beliefs.
Fundamental differences which make one a religion, and the other science.
Science should be taught in science classrooms. Religion has no place in science classrooms.
By definition a myth has no evidence to support it - and neither does the myth of evolution.
Lets see - for 3 years and 5 months of that period I did not exist. I then spent close to 9 months in a womb - and have spent the last almost 36 years living in California and Washington.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
