Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2012, 11:00 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
1,386 posts, read 1,557,843 times
Reputation: 946

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BP72 View Post
Wipers like to smear things. Effective enough.
Windshield wiper fluid and no it wouldn't be effective enough. You'd be better off shooting at the glass to crack it causing the driver and passengers to not be able to see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2012, 11:02 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
1,386 posts, read 1,557,843 times
Reputation: 946
Quote:
Originally Posted by outbacknv View Post
Likely too new to be surplus. Would you be so quick to dismiss this if a Republican administration were in power?
They might have been originally destined to go to Iraq or Afghanistan but were determined not to be needed and already purchased so yes even new they could be surplus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 11:05 PM
 
3,083 posts, read 4,009,142 times
Reputation: 2358
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwa1984 View Post
They might have been originally destined to go to Iraq or Afghanistan but were determined not to be needed and already purchased so yes even new they could be surplus.
Possibly. Whatever the case would you not agree they're overkill for a domestic law enforcement agency?

If things in this country deteriorate to the point federal law enforcement is in need of mine resistant vehicles the likely conflict is between the populace and the political class. Whatever your personal political leanings the likely victims in such a conflict are the populace regardless of whether they lean right or left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2012, 11:06 PM
 
Location: Johnson City, Tn
973 posts, read 1,452,545 times
Reputation: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwa1984 View Post
Windshield wiper fluid and no it wouldn't be effective enough. You'd be better off shooting at the glass to crack it causing the driver and passengers to not be able to see.
Not going to argue this one little point on paint. I will agree to disagree by experience.

I don't know how good the glass is in these since the uparmoring and MRAPs are after my time. I would not trust the old Hummer glass to stop much to begin with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 03:04 AM
 
Location: My little patch of Earth
6,193 posts, read 5,366,177 times
Reputation: 3059
July 2, 2008

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

Barack H. Obama

And no one asked him 'Why?'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 05:00 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,442,711 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by BP72 View Post
OK, apparently they only ordered 2,717 of these. At least that's the constant number I am finding on Google.
But there's that order for 30,000 drones that will be given out to various police forces around the US. Don't forget that.

So who doesn't think the local police are slowly becoming militarized ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 05:13 AM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,521,713 times
Reputation: 7807
It's probably not so much a case of HS needing them as it is that they can get them.

Ever since Congress and the Bush administration created this monster, they've thrown money at it willy-nilly and HS has been "generous" enough to pass it on to local law enforcement agencies in the guise of "security" grants. The dollars are flowing and, given the mindset that "if we don't spend it, we won't get as much next year," it's funding a massive infusion of "toys" to departments which really don't need them.

All it's really accomplishing is the creation of a para-military force with no real mission. Law enforcement is one thing, but military style equipment, training and tactics have little real world use in most day to day police activities....so far.

One thing we can learn from history is that when any agency grows, expands and acquires un-necessary equipment, they'll find a reason to use it. It's like the Department of Defense: Equipment drives tactics, not the other way around, and law enforcement is no different.

The only way to stop it is to shut off the money and NOBODY on either side of the aisle is willing to go home and face the voters after having done that.

Some of us said at the time that the newly created Department of Homeland Security would grow until it had the capability to consume us, but our frightened friends on the right pooh-poohed that prediction. After all, we had to defend ourselves from "turrorist's."

Satisfied now? Let this be a lesson about the Law of Incrementalism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 05:19 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,442,711 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
It's probably not so much a case of HS needing them as it is that they can get them.

Ever since Congress and the Bush administration created this monster, they've thrown money at it willy-nilly and HS has been "generous" enough to pass it on to local law enforcement agencies in the guise of "security" grants. The dollars are flowing and, given the mindset that "if we don't spend it, we won't get as much next year," it's funding a massive infusion of "toys" to departments which really don't need them.

All it's really accomplishing is the creation of a para-military force with no real mission. Law enforcement is one thing, but military style equipment, training and tactics have little real world use in most day to day police activities....so far.

One thing we can learn from history is that when any agency grows, expands and acquires un-necessary equipment, they'll find a reason to use it. It's like the Department of Defense: Equipment drives tactics, not the other way around, and law enforcement is no different.

The only way to stop it is to shut off the money and NOBODY on either side of the aisle is willing to go home and face the voters after having done that.

Some of us said at the time that the newly created Department of Homeland Security would grow until it had the capability to consume us, but our frightened friends on the right pooh-poohed that prediction. After all, we had to defend ourselves from "turrorist's."

Satisfied now? Let this be a lesson about the Law of Incrementalism.
There were plenty on the right that didn't want the Patriot Act passed.
Sadly none of them were in Congress.

And to date, each of the pieces of the Patriot Act that came up for expiration have been extended.

While many Americans don't like the Patriot Act and all that it has done, the folks in DC with the power to end it have other ideas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 07:27 AM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,193,585 times
Reputation: 4801
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwa1984 View Post
That's a Lenco Bearcat commonly used by SWAT teams in the US but not designed like MRAP to take hits from an RPG and roadside bombs.
That is what I figured. Police forces have used armored vehicles for their tactical teams for decades, but when someone finds a picture of one for feds it is Oh My God tanks FEMA panic taking us away!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2012, 07:36 AM
 
45,201 posts, read 26,417,923 times
Reputation: 24964
Quote:
Originally Posted by slackjaw View Post
That is what I figured. Police forces have used armored vehicles for their tactical teams for decades, but when someone finds a picture of one for feds it is Oh My God tanks FEMA panic taking us away!
What do the feds need them for?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top