Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Obama is such a failure that Axelrod can't put anything positive about him out there to run on. The DNC has so little confidence in Obama's record that they won't even talk about it.
So the campaign is now targeted toward getting votes from idiots. Because those are the only Americans left who will vote for Barack.
Because things in our society have changed since Obama used what was available to become a success.
Education at all levels has become extremely expensive...community college and state universities. They both have faced extreme budget cuts mostly due to Republicans... and saying, why should I help pay for someone else's education.
Why should I help?.... because it benefits everyone!
Actually a very large percentage of those who are "successful", i.e. wealthy, did so themself, proving your theory wrong. Lots of americans go to school FOR FREE, further proving your theory wrong. Furthermore, universities havent had budget cuts from the government. Thats 3 strikes, your out!!!
But, Obama is an out of touch, redistributionist elite.
If anyone thinks that Obama is in touch with mainstreet they are nuts.
Not that it really matters if a candidate is or isn't in touch with mainstreet, but I don't think trying to divide people with class warfare is good for the country.
Obama hasn't done anything to help average people get jobs.
Obama may not have as much money as Romney, but he's very well off. Maybe by the time he's Romney's age he'll make even more than Romney.
Why would anyone be swayed by Obama's not being born with a silver spoon in his mouth gimmick?
I thought he was born with golden retriever in his mouth.
nah, obama had affirmative action on his side. he did not need a silver spoon, he had the federal goverment provide one for him instead.
But, Obama is an out of touch, redistributionist elite.
If anyone thinks that Obama is in touch with mainstreet they are nuts.
Not that it really matters if a candidate is or isn't in touch with mainstreet, but I don't think trying to divide people with class warfare is good for the country.
Obama hasn't done anything to help average people get jobs.
Obama may not have as much money as Romney, but he's very well off. Maybe by the time he's Romney's age he'll make even more than Romney.
Why would anyone be swayed by Obama's not being born with a silver spoon in his mouth gimmick?
I thought he was born with golden retriever in his mouth.
I agree. It has gotten so bad that when he makes his "speeches" on the majority of subjects, especially election topics, I don't even listen to him. All he does is continue his BS to such a great degree that even his devotees are finally beginning to doubt him.
Did it ever occur to you he wants MORE people to succeed as greatly as he has?
The people he wants to succeed appear to be the illegals and citizens of countrys other than this one. He has done nothing but put up roadblocks for citizens to overcome and blame others for everything he can come up with.
Quote:
Of course not because the conservative credo is "I've got mine and if you don't have yours then **** you".
Of course the liberal credo would be "you've got yours and I want it but don't want to work for it."
ate the dog
A special case of "jumped the shark," the expression refers to the moment when the popularity of a U.S. President takes a steep nosedive as the result of an unconventional dietary preference.
Example: Obama ate the dog.
And yet the liberals can't say enough about how terrible of Romney to secure a dog to the roof of his car (the dog survived).
Which is worse? That or eating a dog?
Of course, because it is Obama, it is forgivable to lunch on Fido.
So you are, by far, voting for the man who has an elevator for his cars in his mansion and strongly believes that corporations should be treated the same as people.
Of course, Obama would have raised taxes to pay for his elevator, not paid for it out of his own pocket.
What is the reason that you would never vote for someone with a lot of money?
Why have Democrats decided that it's bad to be rich? And that if you are wealthy that you are evil? Are there no Democrats who are millionaires?
How much money does a person have to earn per year to cross that line where Liberals consider them to be evil and unelectable?
Obama makes a lot of money annually. Over $800,000 last year. I would consider that rich.
So what is it with you?
Anyone who makes under $900,000 per year is in touch and good ... and qualified to be your President?
Anyone who makes over $900,000 per year is evil ... and not qualified to be your President?
I'd like to know, because this latest ruse that Romney is rich but Obama isn't -- is Bull Sh*t -- what is the Democrat's explanation for this?
Only an idiot would fall for this crap - or is that what the Left is counting on?
That's the campaign strategy? Fool stupid people? Pathetic and desperate.
"What is the reason that you would never vote for someone with a lot of money?"
Because they are hypocrites.
They whine about Mitt and his EARNED money but they voted for Kennedy, Kerry and Gore, Rockefeller and many others, ALL of which had money they didn't earn.
Did it ever occur to you he wants MORE people to succeed as greatly as he has?
Of course not because the conservative credo is "I've got mine and if you don't have yours then **** you".
Obama had everything handed to him, he received at least three scholarships, from high school to college. He got his free ride and thinks everyone else should too. And after all those scholarships, he never even got a real job. What was he, a senior lecturer, and a community organizer?
And yet the liberals can't say enough about how terrible of Romney to secure a dog to the roof of his car (the dog survived).
Which is worse? That or eating a dog?
Of course, because it is Obama, it is forgivable to lunch on Fido.
Yes, because a 6-year-old boy made the choice to have dog meat for lunch.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
