Solar poles to become quadrupolar in May

[Ferd]

im too lazy. someone go here

Solar Cycle24.com Message and Discussion Board - Space Weather and Solar Activity

and ask Dr. Svalgaard if this is ligit.

[Vascodagama]

Originally Posted by BentBow

Off the east coast of Southern Africa, The magnetic poles have already flipped.

Lets hope not ... that would be a very bad thing

[CDusr]

Originally Posted by Don9

Lets hope not ... that would be a very bad thing

I did include a link from NASA on Earth magnetic pole flipping. You might check it out.
NASA - 2012: Magnetic Pole Reversal Happens All The (Geologic) Time

All though if we are talking about "Polish" flipping all bets are off. (lol)

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by CDusr

Not sure what article you are referencing.

You don't know what article you yourself included in the opening post? That's just weird.

[CDusr]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

You don't know what article you yourself included in the opening post? That's just weird.

There were several articles I posted. (just 2 in the first post) You were unclear. (lol)

I think you were confusing earth vs solar activity and effects.

[BentBow]

Originally Posted by CDusr

I think you were confusing earth vs solar activity and effects.

I was

[CDusr]

Originally Posted by BentBow

I was

The way the one article was worded it would be easy to do. Especially since one doesn't normally associate those terms with the sun and it was discussing earth effects.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by CDusr

There were several articles I posted. (just 2 in the first post) You were unclear. (lol)

How is a direct quotation from the article unclear? Were you so unfamiliar with them that you didn't recognize it?

Originally Posted by CDusr

I think you were confusing earth vs solar activity and effects.

I certainly wasn't. But your article was. And that's why I called it BS,

[CDusr]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

How is a direct quotation from the article unclear? Were you so unfamiliar with them that you didn't recognize it?




I certainly wasn't. But your article was. And that's why I called it BS,

The direct quote was unclear because I didn't go look up the many articles to match the quote. So I asked a question? Seriously dude lose the chip.

If you go back and read it you will see it was not. Maybe you can explain what you mean because from what you stated in your BS comment your protest doesn't make sense.

I read it and it didn't confuse the earth and sun from my perspective so maybe you can elaborate. I think you may have confused terms like poles or equator. I included the NASA article which elaborated on the Hinode findings further.

[CDusr]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

How do we know this "article" is bull****? This one sentence:

Is the eleven year sunspot cycle real? Absolutely!!!!

NASA/Marshall Solar Physics, The Sunspot Cycle

Does it coincide with polar shifts? Not even close!!!!

NASA - 2012: Magnetic Pole Reversal Happens All The (Geologic) Time

11 years... hundreds of thousands of years... nope. Not a whole lot of coinciding going on there.

You are referencing polar shifts on earth. It is talking about magnetic polar changes on the SUN. The original article doesn't question Solar cycles. I don't recall an article that does so not sure what you mean by your so-called quote.