Mitt Romney Appoints Openly Gay Man As National Security And Foreign Policy Spokesman!
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Mitt Romney’s Foreign Policy and National Security Spokesman resigned yesterday after some social conservatives criticized the campaign's appointment of the openly gay Republican.
In a statement published in the Washington Post’s Right Turn, Richard Grenell revealed that his “ability to speak clearly and forcefully on the issues has been greatly diminished by the hyper-partisan discussion of personal issues that sometimes comes from a presidential campaign
Sure seems that way.
Not a word in this man's defense and meanwhile, to borrow a phrase, Bryan Fischer and Tony Perkins are "spiking the football."
"Bryan Fischer, issue director at the American Family Association, a conservative group opposed to same-sex marriage, bragged about his role in the episode.
...
"So ladies and gentlemen, this is a huge win, and it's a huge win for us in regard to Mitt Romney, because Mitt Romney has been forced to say, 'Look, I overstepped my bounds here, I went outside my parameters here, I went off the reservation with this hire, the pro-family community has called me back to the table here, called me back inside the borders of the reservation.'""
Sure seems that way. He threw the guy under the bus as soon as he thought his gayness might tarnish his reputation among the hard core republicans.
He also couldn't have vetted the guy more than a minute and a half. If he did and knew about him being gay ahead of time then Mitt is stupid if he didn't think this appointment would become an issue with the hard core Republicans. Guess Mitt was right when he said he enjoys firing people....or putting pressure on them to resign as he did in this case.
Sure seems that way. He threw the guy under the bus as soon as he thought his gayness might tarnish his reputation among the hard core republicans.
pretty sickening that there's a political party where an unchosen trait is an 'issue' with them, and yet they claim that they're not bigotted and that it's just the left trying to make it up, yet every month they PROVE that's not the case and it doesn't phase them in ANY WAY.
do they think if you're born gay you should be emporverished or made to be homeless? or not be able to work?
dictionary defintion of evil. why do people support evil?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
