Judge wants definition of Natural Born Citizen!

[softblueyz]

Originally Posted by tluv00

If it ends up being that he is not a true citizen then blame the Bush Administration. It happened on their watch no?

You are being sarcastic, I hope.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier

The Ankeny V Daniels case is flawed. It contradicts itself.

And yet, at least a half dozen subsequent courts have been impressed enough with it's conclusions to cite them as precedent.

The alternative universe in which you live must be a very funny place.

[wrecking ball]

Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier

The Ankeny V Daniels case is flawed.

" The Indiana Court rejected the argument that Mr. Obama was ineligible, stating that children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. … This Court finds the decision and analysis of [Ankeny] persuasive."

judge malihi, farrar et al v obama

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_KE...hl=en_US&pli=1

" Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co. , 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986 (1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. See United States v. Wong Kim Ark , 169 U.S. 649, 702-03 (1898) (addressing U. S. Const. amend. XIV); Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana , 916 N.E.2d 678, 684-88 (Ind. App. 2010) (addressing the precise issue). Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise."

judge gordon, allen v obama et al

AZ - 2012-03-07 - Allen v Obama C20121317 - ORDER Dismissing Complaint