Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-05-2012, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,853,515 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Boehner and the GOP will not let this go.

TransCanada has applied for a new permit. All states involved approve and want the project to go forward. One man and his political decision stands in the way.

Obama should do the right thing and approve this project. He gets a do-over, he should take it and the issue off the table.

Obama to get do-over on Keystone pipeline - Washington Times

Quote:
“Today there is just one person standing in the way of tens of thousands of new American jobs: President Obama,” said House Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican. “After nearly four years of review, delay and politics, he is out of excuses for blocking this job-creating energy project any longer. Every state along the proposed route supports the pipeline, and its builder has jumped through every bureaucratic hoop.”
TransCanada applies for new Keystone XL pipeline permit | Energy | News | Financial Post

Quote:
“Certainly our expectation is that the only required new review would be on the actual reroute itself . . . What we are talking, in the scheme of things, (is) a relatively modest reroute,” said Pourbaix, president of TransCanada’s pipeline division.

“As we look at it, we don’t see anything material that was not reviewed in the original application, other than the specific reroute in Nebraska.”
The environ Left/obama WILL find something other than the new route to object to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-05-2012, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,635,840 times
Reputation: 14818
Boehner really should be ashamed of lying like that.

There are no "tens of thousands of jobs."

This has been debunked so many times it is not even funny:

"The reality is that according to the State Department, Keystone XL will only create 6,000 direct jobs with only 10%-15% of those workers being hired locally."

John Boehner Admits That Keystone XL Won’t Create 100,000 Jobs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2012, 09:55 AM
 
58,726 posts, read 26,998,537 times
Reputation: 14163
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Boehner really should be ashamed of lying like that.

There are no "tens of thousands of jobs."

This has been debunked so many times it is not even funny:

"The reality is that according to the State Department, Keystone XL will only create 6,000 direct jobs with only 10%-15% of those workers being hired locally."

John Boehner Admits That Keystone XL Won’t Create 100,000 Jobs
I didn't know it was one of the State Department's duties to predict jobs.

Has the gov't EVER predicted correctly?

"Department Mission Statement
Shape and sustain a peaceful, prosperous, just, and democratic world and foster conditions for stability and progress for the benefit of the American people and people everywhere.
--From the FY 2011 Agency Financial Report,
released November 2011"

Bureau of Resource Management
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2012, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,853,515 times
Reputation: 7118
Even 15,000-20,000 jobs is good...right...right?

Of course, the Left wants you to believe only a a few hundred will do the job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2012, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,187,882 times
Reputation: 4257
"One Person Standing in Way of Tens of Thousands of Jobs" - BHO

One job for one vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2012, 10:19 AM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,308,025 times
Reputation: 7990
But didn't Pres Obama tell us that this kind of thing acts as "stimulus" that reverberates thru the economy? Say you spend $25,000 to fund a puppet show (that was an actual "stimulus" project in my state, and others). Not only is a job created for the puppeteer, there is work for someone to sweep the stage, sell popcorn to the kids, run the cash register at the shop where the puppet supplies are purchased, and so on. Wouldn't the same thing happen with the pipeline? Or is that theory 'void where prohibited.'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2012, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,630 posts, read 23,946,233 times
Reputation: 14953
Our country stands to benefit from this pipeline by more than just the creation of jobs. Existing businesses/jobs will be bolstered, too. It will mean job security for a lot of people that are on the edge of being laid off, and it will keep open businesses that are currently on the verge of closing their doors.

In other words, it will SAVE JOBS! Obama & Co. invented the term to get his spendulous plan through. He got to invent an ambiguous and unprovable concept. He owns it, but like Clinton's term "assault weapon," it's not reserved exclusively for use by the President. If he wants it out there, it can be used by his political opponents, as well.

This pipeline will create AND SAVE many thousands of jobs, at a time during which every single job counts. Heck, once work begins on it, there's a reasonable chance that it'll provide a significant enough push to my little business, a thousand miles away, that we may need to hire an additional person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2012, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,189,935 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Even 15,000-20,000 jobs is good...right...right?

Of course, the Left wants you to believe only a a few hundred will do the job.
Even that number is a lie. The teams will move along the route. Thousands maybe, not tens of thousands, surely not hundreds of thousands. And of cpurse, as with any construction project, the jobs will be gone in a few months.

And so will that tar sands, right on to China.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2012, 10:29 AM
 
27,625 posts, read 21,063,232 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Boehner really should be ashamed of lying like that.

There are no "tens of thousands of jobs."

This has been debunked so many times it is not even funny:

"The reality is that according to the State Department, Keystone XL will only create 6,000 direct jobs with only 10%-15% of those workers being hired locally."

John Boehner Admits That Keystone XL Won’t Create 100,000 Jobs
Don't you realize that this OP propaganda BS is not put out there for the benefit of the informed and intelligent portion of the populace? It's put out there to further reinforce the dumbing down of the already dumbed down misinformed, low infirmation portions of the right wing. If you repeat the lie often enough, something is bound to stick somewhere. The GOP has wound up with a candidate that makes them gag, which will prompt them to pull out all of the stops before the election...anything to detract from the real issues and the laundry list of shortcomings of their candidate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2012, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,189,935 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
Our country stands to benefit from this pipeline by more than just the creation of jobs. Existing businesses/jobs will be bolstered, too. It will mean job security for a lot of people that are on the edge of being laid off, and it will keep open businesses that are currently on the verge of closing their doors.

In other words, it will SAVE JOBS! Obama & Co. invented the term to get his spendulous plan through. He got to invent an ambiguous and unprovable concept. He owns it, but like Clinton's term "assault weapon," it's not reserved exclusively for use by the President. If he wants it out there, it can be used by his political opponents, as well.

This pipeline will create AND SAVE many thousands of jobs, at a time during which every single job counts. Heck, once work begins on it, there's a reasonable chance that it'll provide a significant enough push to my little business, a thousand miles away, that we may need to hire an additional person.
Funny, work is going on along the route as we speak, based on the last two weak jobs reports your theory is deeply flawed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top