Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A lot of ignorant people here who support obama, are seeing Hitler in action and are to ignorant to realize it.
Thanks to the Tea Party and the Republicans, our own little communist half breed will be stopped and the nation saved in November...
A communist Hitler? That's really not a smart thing to type. Although the "half breed" really rounds it off - sort of a racist cherry to top off an ignorance sundae.
Wow, mention Obama taking some of the credit for taking out Ben Laden and look at them righties howl Page after page of righties trying to justify giving no credit whatsoever to Obamas successful accomplishment in the termination of our biggest enemy .
You can bet your bottom dollar had it been a righty President who got Ben Laden we'd never hear the end of it..
Thanks. From your link, Obama has a perfect right to outline the differences between him and his opponent, Romney. After all, we want to know what distinguishes these two presidential candidates.
If Romney is offended by his own words, well...................
Quote:
The irony of the current debate is that Romney and McCain — the GOP’s most recent standard-bearers — are leading the chorus of those seeking to diminish Obama’s authorization of the raid at Abbottabad by implying that “any leader” would have made the same decision.
Quote:
But if their previous public statements were to be believed, neither would have been a lock to pull the trigger. At the time, Romney called Obama’s August 2007 statements about pursuing high-value targets in Pakistan “ill-timed and ill-considered.”
Quote:
And a year after he called Obama’s remarks “naive,” McCain demurred in a discussion with me about the possibility of unilateral U.S. action to bring bin Laden to justice.
A little research (or even reading this thread) would do you a lot of good.
As posted, Bush said that spending billions of dollars to get one man made no sense. And he actually stood by that.
Obama said a lot of things (transparancy, five day reading time for all bills, that he was on the side of all Americans, one of his first acts would be to close Gitmo) and has been proven to have lied about of them.
I guess in your mind that makes him a heroic figure.
Did Obama spend "billions of dollars to get one man," Osama? Or did Obama stick to his script?
Bush spent billions of dollars at war in Iraq to not get the one man we wanted!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.