Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Someone should tell those progressive liberal elitists that their precious UN building sits on land once owned by either the Mohawk Indians or the Mohegans.
Lets give that land back to the Indians first and knock down the UN and turn that land back into trees and grasslands.....
Not that I disagree with you, but I believe the white man purchased that land for some trinkets.
FWIW -
The "Indians" that sold Manhattan Island to the Dutch did not live there or own the place. This set a precedent for most future real estate dealing on this continent.
The Americas have no indigenous peoples. The people we call "Native Americans" or "Indians" were indigenous to Asia. They settled the Americas, just like the Europeans.
But don't tell the academic crowd this! Their feeling of moral superiority is what keeps them going.
The Americas have no indigenous peoples. The people we call "Native Americans" or "Indians" were indigenous to Asia. They settled the Americas, just like the Europeans.
But don't tell the academic crowd this! Their feeling of moral superiority is what keeps them going.
Very serious question here.....
Would you call anybody who says fiat money, a fractional reserve banking system and a central bank a "ponzi scheme", a tin foil hat?
Would you call anybody who says fiat money, a fractional reserve banking system and a central bank a "ponzi scheme", a tin foil hat?
Yes or no?
No, I wouldn't call them a tin foil hat.
Fiat money and central banks are not a "ponzi scheme." Fractional reserve banking is, though. What does this have to do with the UN, indigenous peoples, etc. ?
Fiat money and central banks are not a "ponzi scheme." Fractional reserve banking is, though. What does this have to do with the UN, indigenous peoples, etc. ?
They all tie in...the control of the ponzi scheme over a massive scale is consolidated by the central bank...
Either way...You've stepped out on limbs to support demand side economics and called all the Fed conspiracies a joke...
What I am getting at here, that the Fed has only been around 100 years, fractional reserve banking about 600 years or so and fiat money a couple thousand...
The mechanics of the Fed have been thoroughly dissected, shown time and again how it is a sham that concentrates wealth and seizes absolute power. etc. etc. all to which you claim rubbish...But, this stuff has been broken down to where even the layman can understand it's mechanisms!!
But you want to make an emphatic statement like "THERE WERE NO INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IN AMERICA..NATIVE AMERICANS WERE ASIANS"
THAT is PERFECT example of how science is becoming the new religion....because the "Siberian/Bering bridge, land mass, brick road etc etc" has not been proven and never will be. It's a revisionists tool.
Russia, China & socialist France....sounds like a majority to me!
I know I shouldn't bother entertaining the morons in this thread, but the Black Hills area of South Dakota is to the Lakota/Sioux tribe what Temple Mount is to Jews and Mecca is to Muslims (if both had a big, fat Christian cross mounted on top of both of them).
Assuming what you say is true, what are you intending to do with Mt. Rushmore?
They all tie in...the control of the ponzi scheme over a massive scale is consolidated by the central bank...
Central banks and fiat currencies aren't necessarily ponzi schemes, we just run them that way in the United States. Like I said, fractional reserve banking is what causes the "ponzi" part, not simply the fiat currency or the central bank.
Quote:
Either way...You've stepped out on limbs to support demand side economics and called all the Fed conspiracies a joke...
The mechanics of the Fed have been thoroughly dissected, shown time and again how it is a sham that concentrates wealth and seizes absolute power. etc. etc. all to which you claim rubbish...
I don't know what you're talking about; you must have me confused with someone else.
Quote:
But you want to make an emphatic statement like "THERE WERE NO INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IN AMERICA..NATIVE AMERICANS WERE ASIANS"
This is emphatic.
This is not.
Quote:
THAT is PERFECT example of how science is becoming the new religion....because the "Siberian/Bering bridge, land mass, brick road etc etc" has not been proven and never will be. It's a revisionists tool.
My point? Don't prescribe junk.
So what's your theory ? Are you suggesting that Native Americans are their own race or species, developed in the Americas, independently of Africans/Asians/Europeans ?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
