U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
View Poll Results: Democrats Should Condemn MoveOn
Yes 19 43.18%
No 24 54.55%
Not Sure 1 2.27%
Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll

Reply


 
Old 09-21-2007, 03:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
4,461 posts, read 1,836,142 times
Reputation: 730
Rggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParkTwain View Post
The idea that the U.S. military simply protects Americans and their freedoms is the emperor wearing no clothes. There are folks whose ox is gored when this is stated in any national media forum. There are plenty of folks in the military who are there to perform a job, not as political activists. The military is a powerful domestic political force, but not sacrosanct. This is a difference in political opinions. Get over it.
I love a difference of opinion, that's why I'm on this forum. They showed a lack of class and attempted to smear the man rather than debate. Get over it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-21-2007, 03:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
2,767 posts, read 1,127,154 times
Reputation: 399
Amaznjohn is just really niceAmaznjohn is just really niceAmaznjohn is just really niceAmaznjohn is just really niceAmaznjohn is just really niceAmaznjohn is just really niceAmaznjohn is just really niceAmaznjohn is just really nice
I hope the people who are willing to degrade the character of our military leaders are willing to take responsibility should my son or other parents' sons and/or daughters are wounded or killed by the increased moral of our enemy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2007, 03:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
653 posts, read 265,796 times
Reputation: 254
fitzy24 is a jewel in the roughfitzy24 is a jewel in the roughfitzy24 is a jewel in the roughfitzy24 is a jewel in the roughfitzy24 is a jewel in the roughfitzy24 is a jewel in the rough
A link from worldnutdaily??

hahahahahahahehehehehehelollollol!!

That's all I have to say about that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2007, 04:06 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
4,461 posts, read 1,836,142 times
Reputation: 730
Rggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzy24 View Post
A link from worldnutdaily??

hahahahahahahehehehehehelollollol!!

That's all I have to say about that!
I figured you would say that, and I generally agree with you on worldnetdaily. Let's take a look at one that's more respected like the Washington Post.

Kerry's Cambodia Whopper
Kerry's Cambodia Whopper (washingtonpost.com)
By Joshua Muravchik
Tuesday, August 24, 2004; Page A17

Most of the debate between the former shipmates who swear by John Kerry and the group of other Swift boat veterans who are attacking his military record focuses on matters that few of us have the experience or the moral standing to judge. But one issue, having nothing to do with medals, wounds or bravery under fire, goes to the heart of Kerry's qualifications for the presidency and is therefore something that each of us must consider. That is Kerry's apparently fabricated claim that he fought in Cambodia.

It is an assertion he made first, insofar as the written record reveals, in 1979 in a letter to the Boston Herald. Since then he has repeated it on at least eight occasions during Senate debate or in news interviews, most recently to The Post this year (an interview posted on Kerry's Web site). The most dramatic iteration came on the floor of the Senate in 1986, when he made it the centerpiece of a carefully prepared 20-minute oration against aid to the Nicaraguan contras.


Kerry argued that contra aid could put the United States on the path to deeper involvement despite denials by the Reagan administration of any such intent. Kerry began by reading out similar denials regarding Vietnam from presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon. Then he offered this devastating riposte:

"I remember Christmas of 1968 sitting on a gunboat in Cambodia. I remember what it was like to be shot at by Vietnamese and Khmer Rouge and Cambodians, and have the president of the United States telling the American people that I was not there; the troops were not in Cambodia. I have that memory which is seared -- seared -- in me."

However seared he was, Kerry's spokesmen now say his memory was faulty. When the Swift boat veterans who oppose Kerry presented statements from his commanders and members of his unit denying that his boat entered Cambodia, none of Kerry's shipmates came forward, as they had on other issues, to corroborate his account. Two weeks ago Kerry's spokesmen began to backtrack. First, one campaign aide explained that Kerry had patrolled the Mekong Delta somewhere "between" Cambodia and Vietnam. But there is no between; there is a border. Then another spokesman told reporters that Kerry had been "near Cambodia." But the point of Kerry's 1986 speech was that he personally had taken part in a secret and illegal war in a neutral country. That was only true if he was "in Cambodia," as he had often said he was. If he was merely "near," then his deliberate misstatement falsified the entire speech.

Next, the campaign leaked a new version through the medium of historian Douglas Brinkley, author of "Tour of Duty," a laudatory book on Kerry's military service. Last week Brinkley told the London Telegraph that while Kerry had been 50 miles from the border on Christmas, he "went into Cambodian waters three or four times in January and February 1969 on clandestine missions." Oddly, though, while Brinkley devotes nearly 100 pages of his book to Kerry's activities that January and February, pinpointing the locations of various battles and often placing Kerry near Cambodia, he nowhere mentions Kerry's crossing into Cambodia, an inconceivable omission if it were true.

Now a new official statement from the campaign undercuts Brinkley. It offers a minimal (thus harder to impeach) claim: that Kerry "on one occasion crossed into Cambodia," on an unspecified date. But at least two of the shipmates who are supporting Kerry's campaign (and one who is not) deny their boat ever crossed the border, and their testimony on this score is corroborated by Kerry's own journal, kept while on duty. One passage reproduced in Brinkley's book says: "The banks of the [Rach Giang Thanh River] whistled by as we churned out mile after mile at full speed. On my left were occasional open fields that allowed us a clear view into Cambodia. At some points, the border was only fifty yards away and it then would meander out to several hundred or even as much as a thousand yards away, always making one wonder what lay on the other side." His curiosity was never satisfied, because this entry was from Kerry's final mission.

After his discharge, Kerry became the leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW). Once, he presented to Congress the accounts by his VVAW comrades of having "personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires . . . to human genitals . . . razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan . . . poisoned foodstocks." Later it was shown that many of the stories on which Kerry based this testimony were false, some told by impostors who had stolen the identities of real GIs, but Kerry himself was not implicated in the fraud. And his own over-the-top generalization that such "crimes [were] committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command" could be charged up to youthfulness and the fevers of the times.

But Kerry has repeated his Cambodia tale throughout his adult life. He has claimed that the epiphany he had that Christmas of 1968 was about truthfulness. "One of the things that most struck me about Vietnam was how people were lied to," he explained in a subsequent interview. If -- as seems almost surely the case -- Kerry himself has lied about what he did in Vietnam, and has done so not merely to spice his biography but to influence national policy, then he is surely not the kind of man we want as our president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2007, 04:41 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
1,921 posts, read 933,504 times
Reputation: 534
JoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of lightJoeP is a glorious beacon of light
Kerry served and he gets trashed for it. Nice.

Bush uses the military for political purposes and gets called on it, therefore those who called him out must be trashed as well
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2007, 05:06 PM
Not a member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
92 posts
Reputation: 15
7h3.6h057 is on a distinguished road
free speech should never be condemned. it needs to be tolerated, regardless of agreement or disagreement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2007, 06:25 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
4,461 posts, read 1,836,142 times
Reputation: 730
Rggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to beholdRggr is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeP View Post
Kerry served and he gets trashed for it. Nice.

Bush uses the military for political purposes and gets called on it, therefore those who called him out must be trashed as well
I do not trash Kerry for his service. I respect him for it. The conversation was about the supposed difference between the treatment of moveon.org and the swift boat guys. Are you so used to taking things out of context that you missed that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2007, 08:32 PM
INTJ Mastermind
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
2,164 posts, read 997,697 times
Reputation: 1192
mhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud ofmhouse2001 has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProudCapMarine View Post
Why did 23 U.S. Democrat Senators disagree with you...?
Do you think they are trying to divide our nation?

"No one should condemn a group for asking questions, or has it now become acceptable to taze someone who speaks up?" I love speaking up also. It's fun!

"Thanks for yet another thread that further divides and erodes our country."
Are you saying that I should not have brought this thread up? But isn't that trying to keep me quiet...?

Do you think this forum's moderator should taze me or just ban me?
You do not make sense to me. Every one of your threads pits Americans against Americans. Not one of them ever offers a solution, instead it just points out what the 'bad guys' are doing (and they appear to be anyone who questions authority) and how everyone should rally against their fellow countrymen.

BTW, MoveOn had its best fundraising period in response to this stupidity. Even some of our troops contacted them to show their support of MoveOn's position on this issue. THEY know a lie when they see one, I guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2007, 08:44 PM
In Limbo
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Flamingo Park - West Palm Beach
6,212 posts, read 3,976,785 times
Reputation: 1663
TriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant futureTriMT7 has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaznjohn View Post
I hope the people who are willing to degrade the character of our military leaders are willing to take responsibility should my son or other parents' sons and/or daughters are wounded or killed by the increased moral of our enemy.
"Embolden" our enemy? Please. We "embolden" our enemy by simply BEING THERE, where they are receiving first class lessons in fighting Americans, compliments of a failed foreign policy.

Our "enemy" wouldn't exist if military men weren't used as pawns sent into harms way by politicians and business elite for "extra-curricular" purposes, like deposing regimes that nationalize oil, or invading countries on behalf of fruit companies.

Or are you one of the ones who still think terrorists are motivated primarily because they "hate us our freedoms"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2007, 08:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
2,743 posts, read 1,160,918 times
Reputation: 901
MiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to beholdMiamiRob is a splendid one to behold
MoveOn.Org has the right to freedom of speech & should be allowed to say whatever they want. It's funny when the shoe is on the other foot it's "sacrilegious" yet how many conservatives didn't have a problem with the "SwiftBoat Veterans" and the attack on Kerry and his record?

ProudCap you are to close to the fire to have any objectivity on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:55 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top