Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"The White House Visitors Office requires that an unborn child—still residing in utero—must be counted as a full human being when its parents register for a White House tour, according to documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. Crazy as it may sound, you MUST include the baby in the overall count of guests in the tour. It’s an easy process.
LAST NAME: The family’s last name
FIRST NAME: “Baby” as a first name
"
How does this square up with the liberal pro-abortionist argument that a "baby" is not a "baby" until it's born?
According to Liberal Logic, shouldn't the total count include "Fetus" instead? A "fetus" is not a person according to pro-abortionists, so someone at the pro-abortion White House must be really, really confused.
I suspect the pro-abortion Obama is just collecting data about pregnant women who shouldn't be burdened with babies.
More likely data-mining; afterall, the goverment has already spent any money that fetus, if not being carried by a pro-abortionist mother, would make in its lifetime.
Of course, the possibility also exists that the Obama administration is padding the DNC voter rolls with the not-yet-born.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC
How does this square up with the liberal pro-abortionist argument that a "baby" is not a "baby" until it's born?
STILL incapable of understanding the very simple word C-H-O-I-C-E and making asinine attempts to replace it with abortion, eh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC
According to Liberal Logic, shouldn't the total count include "Fetus" instead? A "fetus" is not a person according to pro-abortionists, so someone at the pro-abortion White House must be really, really confused.
Please cite at least one dcoumented example of someone actually advocating abortion in the White House to support your otherwise asinine, baseless, inane "pro-abortion" Fright Wing BULLS**T!
I know you're fond of saying you despise liberalism.
You are a perfect example of why I despise the BS artistes of the Fright Wing.
The only reason for this (change in defininition) they need NAMES to stuff the ballot boxes with - Obama knows he can't win the next election (fairly) So.. all the pieces are in place for Soros & company to COUNT THE VOTES. Michelle opened her mouth claiming; its going to come down to just one vote.
She went on to say it could even mean registering one more person to vote.
“And I want you to think about -- just for a minute -- about what these kind of numbers mean when they're spread out over an entire state,” she continued. “It might mean registering just one more person in your town. That’s how crucial this is. One more person might mean helping just one more person in your community get out and vote on Election Day.”
“So know that with every door you knock on, truly, with every call you make, with every conversation you have, you have to remember that this could be the one that makes the difference -- truly, every interaction,” the first lady said. “You could be the one who inspires that person to make their voice heard this November.”
"The White House Visitors Office requires that an unborn child—still residing in utero—must be counted as a full human being when its parents register for a White House tour, according to documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. Crazy as it may sound, you MUST include the baby in the overall count of guests in the tour. It’s an easy process.
LAST NAME: The family’s last name
FIRST NAME: “Baby” as a first name
"
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier
The White house considers an unborn baby a live human being for administrative purposes.
Most states charge people who kill a pregnant woman with two counts of murder - the law considers the "fetus" to be a live human being.
Abortion is legal.
Does anyone see the disconnect here?
What I see is you conveniently ignoring the way the simple word choice alters circumstances.
Does a murder victim choose to be mudered, which if it's a pregnant woman also terminates a fetus that would develop into a human being?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
