Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-17-2012, 06:48 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,265 posts, read 26,192,233 times
Reputation: 15637

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ted08721 View Post
You are correct we need to regulate the financial industry more, not less. There was resistance from some that we were over regulated, need to let wall street have a free hand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-22-2012, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,265 posts, read 26,192,233 times
Reputation: 15637
"Here’s what the presumptive Republican presidential nominee said about JPMorgan’s $2 billion loss (which may actually have been $3 billion, or $5 billion, or more, but who’s counting?): “This was a loss to shareholders and owners of JPMorgan and that’s the way America works. Some people experienced a loss in this case because of a bad decision. By the way, there was someone who made a gain.”



http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/21/op...rssnyt&emc=rss
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2012, 07:06 PM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,930,930 times
Reputation: 1119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
You are correct we need to regulate the financial industry more, not less. There was resistance from some that we were over regulated, need to let wall street have a free hand.
I dislike the paradigm of "less" or "more".
What we need is proper regulation and transparency. What goes on in the "shadows", is one of the big issues here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2012, 02:54 PM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,930,930 times
Reputation: 1119
Looks like this could be much bigger if one addresses IR Swaps. Eventually, seems the whole derivative house of cards would come down at some point. Guess we will see.

U.S. Treasury Bond Teetering Tower Of Babel, Fed Stuck At 0 ...
quote:
the Jackass pointed a finger at the USTreasury Bond tower, the Interest Rate Swap support mechanism, and offered an argument that the losses for JPMorgan were closer to $18 billion. Furthermore, an argument was made that the losses would top $100 billion in a year's time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top