Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I would agree with that. I would also agree that Obama was not qualified to be president. The last four years have shown this to be true.
For all those so concerned about the vice president, when (outside of assassinations) has the VP made any difference at all? Should one choose a less competent president, simply due to their VP choice? A rational person would say , "no".
Maybe, maybe not. But I'm just wondering why we're back to Palin. Four years later with another election looming and what, for politics, is ancient history is being rehashed. Why?
Maybe, maybe not. But I'm just wondering why we're back to Palin. Four years later with another election looming and what, for politics, is ancient history is being rehashed. Why?
Because all the left cares about is trying to distract us from Obama's record.
McCain and Palin are not running.Did you accidently step into the way back machine.
The sub forum is entitled "Elections." And the revelation by the man in charge of vetting VP candidates for the GOP for more than 20 years talked about something we've not seen reported on previously - regarding an "election." The 2008 election. It's likely this same man will be involved in Mitt Romney's VP possibilities vetting as well. You may not find it worthy of discussion. That's fine with me. Just don't try to imply to others they shouldn't discuss it. Simply move-on.
I would agree with that. I would also agree that Obama was not qualified to be president. The last four years have shown this to be true.
For all those so concerned about the vice president, when (outside of assassinations) has the VP made any difference at all? Should one choose a less competent president, simply due to their VP choice? A rational person would say , "no".
I don't know, Joe Biden sure made a big difference lately.
Maybe, maybe not. But I'm just wondering why we're back to Palin. Four years later with another election looming and what, for politics, is ancient history is being rehashed. Why?
My thoughts exactly. And besides, we know now that Obama is infinitely less qualified (I don't belive Palin was unqualified), and he was running for POTUS. Look what he has done! We are in ruin!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
