Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-25-2012, 06:52 PM
 
Location: Fuquay-Varina
4,003 posts, read 10,840,583 times
Reputation: 3303

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Basic infantry training was part of boot camp, for the males. All males graduate Marine boot camp with a basic MOS of 0311 (Infantryman). Infantry training comes during the Third Phase of boot camp, which includes the gas chamber, live-fire obstacle training, close-quarters combat training, and a three day mock engagement. Then those males who are actually assigned to an infantry unit go through additional training when they reach their permanent party, the SOI.
Maybe that is what has changed as the females go through the 3rd phase training now. Did they not go through that in the past? She will never get the advanced combat training of the 0311's though. Thanks for your service.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-25-2012, 06:59 PM
 
Location: Fuquay-Varina
4,003 posts, read 10,840,583 times
Reputation: 3303
Quote:
Originally Posted by nzrugby View Post
It is amusing that those who have never been in the Infantry seem to believe they are experts on what is needed in being part of the Infantry.
Not an attempt at amusement, but I am certainly no expert either. There are some tough ladies out there that could handle it though is really the only point I was making....well that and being proud of my daughter anyway lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2012, 07:00 PM
 
Location: 53179
14,416 posts, read 22,483,779 times
Reputation: 14479
There is more than just be able to match the men physically. ( running, pushups, situps etc ) They also need to " fit in " and not be sensitive to derogatory insults and foul language, sexual jokes that are exchanges between the guys in the field. They can't be running to their commander and cry about being offended. As a woman you have to be extra tough, tougher than the guy. If you can do that, then there should be no reason for women not to be able to join.

Last edited by glass_of_merlot; 05-25-2012 at 07:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 12:11 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,450,574 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by sacredgrooves View Post
Maybe that is what has changed as the females go through the 3rd phase training now. Did they not go through that in the past? She will never get the advanced combat training of the 0311's though. Thanks for your service.
As I mentioned previously, women recruits went through a completely separate boot camp. Unlike the other military branches that have co-ed basic training, the Marines are separate. It is tradition in the Marine Corps to train every man, regardless of their MOS, to be an Infantryman first. It is one of the things that separates the Marine Corps from every other branch of the military. Obviously, that is not the case with women Marines.

I have no problem with women serving in any MOS in any military branch for which they qualify, providing there is only one standard for qualification that applies to both men and women. There will be many women that do not qualify, just as there are many men that also do not qualify. If everyone has to adhere to the same standards then there can be no complaint. Morale will not suffer, and lives will not be lost because of political correctness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 12:12 AM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,413,299 times
Reputation: 55562
i dont think they are banned bek they are women. i think they are concerned about women being targets of rape
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 04:20 AM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,147,970 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
i dont think they are banned bek they are women. i think they are concerned about women being targets of rape
Oh please! Women can be raped anywhere. Are you proposing they all be locked up so no one can rape them


Women can't be restricted because they might be raped.


And yes, their fellow soldiers DO rape them and the military covers it up. If the military dealt with it's rapists like civilian rapists are dealt with that would cut down on the rapes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 05:32 AM
 
Location: Neither here nor there
14,810 posts, read 16,206,409 times
Reputation: 33001
Quote:
Originally Posted by glass_of_merlot View Post
There is more than just be able to match the men physically. ( running, pushups, situps etc ) They also need to " fit in " and not be sensitive to derogatory insults and foul language, sexual jokes that are exchanges between the guys in the field. They can't be running to their commander and cry about being offended. As a woman you have to be extra tough, tougher than the guy. If you can do that, then there should be no reason for women not to be able to join.
You bring up a good point. When it's just men and they are in a high-tension environment (like combat), they can be pretty crude. A woman amongst them would have to be, not just immune to that kind of talk, but crude enough herself to get along and be part of the team.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 06:06 AM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,147,970 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cunucu Beach View Post
You bring up a good point. When it's just men and they are in a high-tension environment (like combat), they can be pretty crude. A woman amongst them would have to be, not just immune to that kind of talk, but crude enough herself to get along and be part of the team.
So? Naughty language should keep women from serving their country?

How ridiculous !
Sorry, but women don't wear white gloves and flowered hats anymore, nor do they blush at "bad words, they even VOTE!

They , LIKE SOME MEN, would have to be immune to that kind of talk OR crude enough herself/himself to get along .

Yup! That's real life!


Do you REALLY think women never hear or use bad language outside of the military?!?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 06:10 AM
 
Location: Neither here nor there
14,810 posts, read 16,206,409 times
Reputation: 33001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
So? Naughty language should keep women from serving their country?

How ridiculous !
Sorry, but women don't wear white gloves and flowered hats anymore, nor do they blush at "bad words, they even VOTE!

They , LIKE SOME MEN, would have to be immune to that kind of talk OR crude enough herself/himself to get along .

Yup! That's real life!


Do you REALLY think women never hear or use bad language outside of the military?!?!
What in that post made you think I was opposed to women using crude language or being in a combat situation? If you care to check back a few pages, I said I'm on board with women being allowed into combat.

I'll say this much. There isn't a modicum of doubt in my mind that you would have no trouble whatsoever talking the rough language of combat.

Last edited by Cunucu Beach; 05-26-2012 at 06:31 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2012, 07:08 AM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,147,970 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cunucu Beach View Post
What in that post made you think I was opposed to women using crude language or being in a combat situation? If you care to check back a few pages, I said I'm on board with women being allowed into combat.

I'll say this much. There isn't a modicum of doubt in my mind that you would have no trouble whatsoever talking the rough language of combat.
And do you consider that an insult? Why?

Do you look down on those in the military who use rough language?

Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:51 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top