Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-06-2012, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,367,200 times
Reputation: 6541

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
I think this is the winner here. So outlaw public worker unions and employees right of collective bargaining. Then the government can hire more and more and take over more work with their cheap workforce. Isnt that the GOP dream? Big government and control over the citizens. Why not hand out jail time for being late to work too? How far are you willing to go here?
Every State should be a "Right-To-Work" State. No one should be forced to join, and pay, a union to keep their job. Public sector unions subvert the will of the people and should never be allowed under any circumstances. Anyone who proposes establishing a public sector union should be shot on sight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-06-2012, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,386,377 times
Reputation: 9617
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
True, Walker himself is caught on video saying he is going to "divide and conquer" the state, first starting with collective bargaining, then moving onto destroying the private sector.
false

walker has nothing to do with the private sector.unless he is going to RAISE taxes to kill the private sector...like liberals do

even FDR said that public employees should NOT have barganing rights
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2012, 02:02 PM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,771,761 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucsLose View Post
Yeah...that's his goal. Destroy the private sector!
Your great master is caught on video saying so. He is completely owned by the Koch's and other right wing extremists that want nothing more than to destroy the middle class to reign in their corporatist fascism.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BucsLose View Post
Its time for you people to get over your loss, that you deserved, and move on. The public tax payer funded unions got what was coming to them, and what they deserved. Deal with it.
The only ones that lost were Walker's corporate owners spending over 30 million dollars and gained nothing
Though I don't see why those on the far right think destroying teachers and the middle class, while spending like madmen on giveaways to the rich is a good thing. It sounds like something only someone that was truly deranged would stand by

Quote:
Originally Posted by BucsLose View Post
We can only hope this spreads. You dont have to always raise taxes to get things done as Wisconsin proved.
False, Walker eliminated the homested exemption causing property taxes to go up quite substantially to many, hitting the elderly the hardest and ones that relied on it most.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BucsLose View Post
You dont always have to fire people.
More lies, over 300 teachers lost their jobs, that Walker said wouldn't happen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BucsLose View Post
Some times all it takes, is a little bit of common sense. A little bit of these guys paying in to their own pensions and such. Its not that difficult to understand or justify because its common sense. Unless you're a liberal.
Uh, you do understand that the teacher's union agreed 100% with Walker and the GOP's massive cuts to their salaries and pensions right?
The teacher's union understood that the state was in trouble and there needed to be some serious belt tightening to be done, which is why they agreed to it. Walker on the other hand went up and beyond by trying to completely destroy them, which is what the whole recall was about in the first place.
You are right, it's not that difficult to understand or justify wanting to have a thriving middle class and a great nation for everyone, because it's common sense. Unless you're a right winger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2012, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,386,377 times
Reputation: 9617
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
Your great master is caught on video saying so. He is completely owned by the Koch's and other right wing extremists that want nothing more than to destroy the middle class to reign in their corporatist fascism.


corporate fascism.....liberalism


its liberals and their globalist policies that have been killing the middleclass
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2012, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,386,377 times
Reputation: 9617
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
False, Walker eliminated the homested exemption causing property taxes to go up quite substantially to many, hitting the elderly the hardest and ones that relied on it most.



.
not quite the way you put it

In July 2010, Wisconsin initiated a new transitional jobs pilot program for jobless adults who don’t have access to unemployment benefits. In contrast to the state’s other welfare reform programs, workers in the new pilot program will be eligible for the state and federal EITC and the Property Tax Circuit Breaker, known as the Homestead Tax Credit. State fiscal analysts expect it to increase the cost of the state EITC by $1 million per year.

Although the Wisconsin EITC appears to be politically popular, on March 1, 2011, Governor Scott Walker introduced his 2011-2013 biennial budget, which called for reducing the EITC by $41.3 million over the next two years.

On Tuesday, May 31, the Joint Finance Committee adopted a change to the EITC that would modify the Governor’s proposal, increasing the total size of the EITC cut to $56.2 million, and changing how families will be affected. Families with two children will only be able to claim 11 percent of the EITC, compared to the current 14 percent, a less severe cut than the governor proposed, and families with three or more children will be able to claim 34 percent instead of 43 percent, a more severe cut than under the Governor’s proposal. Under the JFC proposal, families with two children will have a maximum cut of $154 (compared to $307 in the Governor’s plan), and families with three or more kids will face a maximum cut of as much as $518 (versus $154 in the Governor’s bill).

The legislature passed the budget without changing the EITC provision, and the governor signed it on June 26. Despite reducing the credit, Wisconsin will continue to provide one of the higher state EITC benefits in the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2012, 02:14 PM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,771,761 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
corporate fascism.....liberalism


its liberals and their globalist policies that have been killing the middleclass
0-3 on this thread alone, keep up the good work parroting the right wing propaganda, the right wing machine wants you to
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2012, 02:14 PM
 
58,600 posts, read 26,908,480 times
Reputation: 14135
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Yes, public compensation is grossly out of line with private compensation -- private compensation is higher.
You might want to find a source that doesn't
have an agenda!

About the Center

The Center conducts research and analysis to help shape public debates over proposed budget and tax policies and to help ensure that policymakers consider the needs of low-income families and individuals in these debates. We also develop policy options to alleviate poverty.
In addition, the Center examines the short- and long-term impacts of proposed policies on the health of the economy and the soundness of federal and state budgets. Among the issues we explore are whether federal and state governments are fiscally sound and have sufficient revenue to address critical priorities, both for low-income populations and for the nation as a whole.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2012, 02:24 PM
 
2,729 posts, read 5,348,789 times
Reputation: 1785
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
There is a fundamental difference between private and public employee unions.
I one case you have the interests of the employees in contrast to the profits of a private company.
In the other you have the interests of public employees in contrast to the interests of the taxpayers.
The latter has resulted in many municipalities spending more in pensions than they do on education, or maintenance of essential services which is the purpose of government to begin with.
We are definitely in a situation where the tail has been wagging the dog, and it was good to see the beginnings of a turnaround in last night’s elections.
I believe that Unions are necessary. All you have to do is read Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle" to see a world without Unions.

However, Unions cannot be allowed to become "all powerful" - which is what, by nature, they want to do. There must be BALANCE.

In privately owned companies, Management/Union balance is easier. If the company goes broke, everyone is out of a job. Therefore, it is in everyone's best interest to work together and make compromises.

With Public Employee Unions, however, there is no such balance. Municipalities don't go broke. They just raise property taxes. So the balance has to come as a result of something else. That "something else" is ELECTIONS.


In all things... BALANCE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2012, 03:26 PM
 
25,777 posts, read 16,394,630 times
Reputation: 15959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big George View Post
I believe that Unions are necessary. All you have to do is read Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle" to see a world without Unions.

However, Unions cannot be allowed to become "all powerful" - which is what, by nature, they want to do. There must be BALANCE.

In privately owned companies, Management/Union balance is easier. If the company goes broke, everyone is out of a job. Therefore, it is in everyone's best interest to work together and make compromises.

With Public Employee Unions, however, there is no such balance. Municipalities don't go broke. They just raise property taxes. So the balance has to come as a result of something else. That "something else" is ELECTIONS.


In all things... BALANCE
These Republipunks don't read much, other than what they post on here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2012, 03:26 PM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,262,906 times
Reputation: 5194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big George View Post
I believe that Unions are necessary. All you have to do is read Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle" to see a world without Unions.

However, Unions cannot be allowed to become "all powerful" - which is what, by nature, they want to do. There must be BALANCE.

In privately owned companies, Management/Union balance is easier. If the company goes broke, everyone is out of a job. Therefore, it is in everyone's best interest to work together and make compromises.

With Public Employee Unions, however, there is no such balance. Municipalities don't go broke. They just raise property taxes. So the balance has to come as a result of something else. That "something else" is ELECTIONS.


In all things... BALANCE
The problem is elections do not cure the ills of public unions. So far the only solution’s to public unions has been the bankruptcy of the municipalities.
They have become an out of control monster that run up huge budget deficits, take money from roads, water systems, sewers, increase taxes, cause layoffs, and eventually bankrupt the entire system.
While I support private unions and the institution of collective bargaining, public unions are a disaster, and in complete contrast to the interest of the public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top