Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-30-2012, 09:07 PM
 
2,085 posts, read 2,133,237 times
Reputation: 3498

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hot_handz View Post
no...all you've done is regurgitate your trusty bookmarks on fuzzy studies that in the end prove.......nothing.

Then you come back with your "oh...but...the weighted data says...."

well, if you have a 51/49 split on something one side is weighted isn't it? But it's very trivial.

Also, let's be honest... Why would i need to read the full article? I have read the cherry picked excerpts from said studies that you pound in every gay thread.

Again.... You can disregard words used in studies as "semantics"..but semantics are words and they have meaning. Especially in the context of science. "it would appear" you are taking studies, based on something you are very passionate about, for face value.

Come up with a study showing how the brain of a 2 month old fetus can be "convinced"...how does a 2 month old brain know about gender? How can a 2 month old brain understand what defines gender?

"it would appear" that you don't believe in pseudo-science.

Because of this..."it would appear" you take science as your personal religion...

At the very best all you have shown...after the redundant postings of the same studies.....is that it can neither be proven or disproven at this point. So people are totally justified into carrying the notion that humans choose who they want to develop relationships and feeling for, and further, act upon those emotions.

But all you have proven is that you have feelings.

+1

Excellent post Hot Handz!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2012, 09:20 PM
 
Location: Lower east side of Toronto
10,567 posts, read 12,792,358 times
Reputation: 9399
So liberish - They always mention their feelings..their sensations..emotionalism run wild..Logic dictates -liberalism is about sensationalism...and stimuli that can make a fish swim left - can be countered by another stimulation that might be a beam of light- or a noise- We are to strive to be above sensationalism- Some believe that you should go where ever the wind blows you...The natural world is evil...that's the facts..The message of the higher religions was that we are to overcome the natural and be super natural.

The trend to giving way to sensation became a cultural norm- I remember hippy culture back in 67...and the phrase "If it feels good do it" That is the mantra of liberalism- which is not freedom or control by a trap of containment...that ruins and debases humanity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 09:47 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,354,108 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
If you are hurting another IT IS WRONG.

Your rights end at another persons nose.

I don't care who says something is ok. If it hurts a person, or they are under the age of consent, or they say no. You can NOT do it.

Why is that so hard to understand?
You know the old saying "Ignorance is bliss"?

Well, when we are talking about protecting children from harm, ignorance is dangerous.

The ignorance expressed by some of the posters on this thread is alarming and disturbing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 10:02 PM
 
17,290 posts, read 29,349,509 times
Reputation: 8691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
You know the old saying "Ignorance is bliss"?

Well, when we are talking about protecting children from harm, ignorance is dangerous.

The ignorance expressed by some of the posters on this thread is alarming and disturbing.

Most upsetting, it's WILLFUL ignorance. The very worst kind!

They "don't give a fig" about science, prevailing psychological studies, definitional NUANCE ... it's about their feeeeelings (AKA, prejudice)... they way THEY think it "should be".... not the way it "is!"


Hats of to you though, you have a far greater tolerance for responding to their BS than most of us!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 10:04 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,354,108 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
An interesting perspective on this criminal.





Articles: Moral Relativism and the Plight of a Pedophile
Oh please. This irrational piece is about as stupid as saying that because rapists think raping women is okay, that society should endorse rape.

If Brinkin is proven to be a child molestor and/or is spreading child porn, he will be incarcerated...as he should be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 10:09 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,354,108 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
If you are hurting another IT IS WRONG.

Your rights end at another persons nose.

I don't care who says something is ok. If it hurts a person, or they are under the age of consent, or they say no. You can NOT do it.

Why is that so hard to understand?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
That's fine.....but you have no other logic to base it on other than it being your personal preference. A much harder concept to grasp for many people.
This is an llogical statement. It's not her 'personal preference'. Child sexual abuse hurts children and is against the law. How hard is that concept to grasp?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 10:13 PM
 
Location: Lower east side of Toronto
10,567 posts, read 12,792,358 times
Reputation: 9399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
This is an llogical statement. It's not her 'personal preference'. Child sexual abuse hurts children and is against the law. How hard is that concept to grasp?
It will rob a child of a life time of peace- contentment and joy...It for ever alters their future in the most negative way-----------it is right up there with murder...I call it soul stealing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 10:22 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, California
4,373 posts, read 3,222,916 times
Reputation: 1041
*yawn*

Just another thread attempting to slander gays yet again.

Look you goofs - this is a pedophile who happens to be gay.

Non-news.

Next?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 10:30 PM
 
Location: Here
2,887 posts, read 2,629,098 times
Reputation: 1981
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
Male on Male sex is called homosexuality. I don't give a fig if one is 100 and the other is 10 years old. If both are 12 years old, or if they're both 8 years old. Same sex activity is called homosexuality.
This. Yet when it comes to pedophilia the homosexual activists want this reality overlooked because it reflects poorly on homosexuality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 11:06 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,354,108 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oleg Bach View Post
It will rob a child of a life time of peace- contentment and joy...It for ever alters their future in the most negative way-----------it is right up there with murder...I call it soul stealing.
I agree with you on that.

If we are to protect children from sexual abuse, everyone needs to educate themselves on the facts.

Those people who spread hysterical prejudiced misinformaton are harming children in the long run.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top