Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wrong. The three branches of government were designed to check each other, not to usurp each other's responsibilities. Read the Constitution. Get a clue.
Well these days they seem to be usurping and not checking
And no one seems to care either.
Wrong. The three branches of government were designed to check each other, not to usurp each other's responsibilities. Read the Constitution. Get a clue.
It is now time for you to explain how Obama has not gone around the Congress time and again. Since you think that one group is the legislators and one the enforcer maybe you can explain how the legislators have been taken we apart by the enforcer. Do you really not see what Obama has been doing and why?
Wrong. The three branches of government were designed to check each other, not to usurp each other's responsibilities. Read the Constitution. Get a clue.
Someone has to wake up this country while there is still a chance to take our country back from a near dictator.
What an odd statement, given the fact that Supreme Court justices are removed from democratic constraints and have life tenure. Those nine justices are the closest thing to a dictatorship that we have in America.
It is now time for you to explain how Obama has not gone around the Congress time and again.
He has executed the prerogatives of his office as has every president before him. What in particular are you all ferklempt about?
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy
Since you think that one group is the legislators and one the enforcer maybe you can explain how the legislators have been taken we apart by the enforcer.
I don't even know what language that was. Try again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy
Do you really not see what Obama has been doing and why?
I fully admit that I do not see the wacky and delusional things you routinely accuse him of.
There's a whole long list of non-sequiturs in that account. But again, the "practically 100% Italian areas" should be your first clue as to the extent of their genuine tolerance of diversity.
They didn't get too choose anywhere, my paternal grandparents lived in the East Boston projects not because they wanted to be around Italians but because they couldn't afford anywhere else, they moved out of the projects into a nicer town eventually, which was more Diverse.
Excellent article here about this man. He's supposed to be impartial, but represents the right-leaning Roberts contingent that is biased. He needs to resign, enabling the President to put someone in there who is far more capable.
Ah yes, the Progressives have Scalia in their crosshairs yet never seem to complain about the justices who vote for their pet causes. The war cry has been out for what is left of Scalia's scalp what, Monday morning? Notice the rash of anti-Justice Scalia threads since then.
Wrong. The three branches of government were designed to check each other, not to usurp each other's responsibilities. Read the Constitution. Get a clue.
You need to go back to school. The executive branch is not supposed to be legislating through executive orders or through its cabinet departments. The court is supposed to rule on constitutionality and the executive branch is to abide by the ruling. That executive is the branch doing the usurping these days. If there wasn't an election coming soon, an impeachment would be in order.
What an odd statement, given the fact that Supreme Court justices are removed from democratic constraints and have life tenure. Those nine justices are the closest thing to a dictatorship that we have in America.
But the congress can over ride most of their rulings by passing a new law to counteract their rulings. An executive running amok, like Obama doesn't follow the constitution at all. He is bypassing congress, making his own laws and ignoring the courts. We may survive if he is only in office for 6 more months.
Excellent article here about this man. He's supposed to be impartial, but represents the right-leaning Roberts contingent that is biased. He needs to resign, enabling the President to put someone in there who is far more capable.
if you are using the standard that a justice should be impartial, then we need to replace ALL the justices on the court and replace them with robots. you are never going to get an impartial justice regardless of who is put on the court.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
so predictable.
