Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I actually agree. If I were president, I would have defended the law, even though I would suspect it is not constitutional.
What rather set this care apart: the liar at the center of the case was not trying to profit off his lie. I imagine (although I have yet to read the opinion) that since it was 'pure speech', the Court felt it had no choice but to strike down the act.
If you were President you would have defended the law suspecting that it was not Constitutional?
Should my Dad have been prosecuted? He was a Marine in WWII and had a cigar box full of medals. He usually denied being in the military unless it was family or someone he was lifelong friends with.
The Government invited him to the WWII Memorial opening ceremony in DC all expenses paid, he didn't even acknowledge it.
Let people crow about their military service, I almost always assume they are lying.
This is true, about bragging
My grandfather was on the 2nd wave at Omaha Beach..... but rarely talked about it..... not something he talked about because of the memories and when he was invited to go to France he declined
Feel free to post a source from a objective legal scholar that Ginsberg's jurisprudence is suspected of being politically biased? With specific court cases. I'll be happy to read them.
Sorry. It's allot more complex than my right wing justice is better than your left wing justice.
Feel free to post a source from a objective legal scholar that Ginsberg's jurisprudence is suspected of being politically biased? With specific court cases. I'll be happy to read them.
Sorry. It's allot more complex than my right wing justice is better than your left wing justice.
We already know how she (?) feels about the constitution.....
You have already made it left vs right justice.... with your partisan statement about Scalia.....those criticizing him are all on the left, you should know this
We already know how she (?) feels about the constitution.....
You have already made it left vs right justice.... with your partisan statement about Scalia.....those criticizing him are all on the left, you should know this
What on earth is left v right about advise on writing a Constitution?
As I suspected, you don't know what an a legal argument is.
It's not your typical political tripe from the right wing Daily Caller..
Tell me please you didn't get into the College Station campus? Are you even aware of any sources you can go to to get a real legal objective analysis of legal opinions?
What on earth is left v right about advise on writing a Constitution?
As I suspected, you don't know what an a legal argument is.
It's not your typical political tripe from the right wing Daily Caller..
Obviously, you don't know what a legal argument is.... you have made it a partisan issue
When Scalia rules on something (to you) it is political
When Ginsburg rules, (to you) it is a good ruling
To be expected from a Liberal..... just quit while you are losing bro.....
It appears that your Sam Houston St. education did not include basing your statements on facts...... just biased opinions
I will move on to another thread since there is little to be gained from as internet argument with a partisan idiot
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
