Doctors messing with Mother Nature: Women could delay the menopause indefinitely with ovary transplant (ethics, lawyers)

[enemy country]

Originally Posted by EdwardA

The arrogance of man will be our undoing as a species.


Women could delay the menopause indefinitely with ovary transplant: doctors - Telegraph

This is none of our business EA

[hammertime33]

Originally Posted by EdwardA

Frankly we're not comparing two similar things. Doctors/Scientists using their talents to prevent diseases is quite a different matter than trying to interfere with normal human biology.

Many women use modern medicine to stop their monthly periods.
Some people mess with human biology and undergone permanent laser hair removal for aesthetic reasons.
Many people mess with human biology and cut of their son's foreskins.
Many men mess with human biology and undergo a vasectomy.
Many women mess with human biology and undergo tubal ligation.

I see nothing wrong with a women avoiding going through menopause if she so chooses.


And my post was simply pointing out that your take on historical mortality rates was just flat wrong.

[twinArmageddons]

Originally Posted by enemy country

This is none of our business EA

This.

If it doesn't harm anyone, then what's the issue?

[wildflower82]

This is up to the women, but why the hell would you want kids past 35 anyway. Babies are cute teenager's are work.

They're linking autism and other mental problems to older men producing, this may just add to more mental issues. I think they should consider the child and being an old parent who can't play ball or chase the ball, wouldn't be much fun for the kid.

[Big George]

Originally Posted by Who?Me?!

I take it you believe Viagra is messing with Mother Nature........???

Viagra is about an erection, not reproduction.

PM me if you need to have me explain the difference to you.

[twinArmageddons]

Originally Posted by Big George

Viagra is about an erection, not reproduction.

PM me if you need to have me explain the difference to you.

However, a good point can be found there:

Why does it matter? If it doesn't harm anyone, then why get your panties in a twist?

[hammertime33]

Originally Posted by 3~Shepherds

This is up to the women, but why the hell would you want kids past 35 anyway. Babies are cute teenager's are work.

They're linking autism and other mental problems to older men producing, this may just add to more mental issues. I think they should consider the child and being an old parent who can't play ball or chase the ball, wouldn't be much fun for the kid.

I could ask my parents if you'd like. My mom was 36 and 38 when she birthed me and my sister (my dad is 1 year older than my mother).

[Who?Me?!]

Originally Posted by Big George

Viagra is about an erection, not reproduction.

PM me if you need to have me explain the difference to you.

So you think "Mother Nature" only has to do with reproduction?

Well, that's really an odd opinion, but it IS yours....


But I AM confused ....I always thought an erection had lots to do with reproduction!

I know not always(artificial insemination, test tube babies....) but still....

[WannaliveinGreenville]

I don't think women want to menstrate for 89 years....

[helenejen]

Originally Posted by WannaliveinGreenville

I don't think women want to menstrate for 89 years....

Wish I could rep you one million times for this all too astute observation!!!!