Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-07-2012, 05:15 PM
 
26,143 posts, read 19,823,041 times
Reputation: 17241

Advertisements

This is one example of a totally BRAINWASHED SHEEPLE IDIOT!!!!

www.youtube.com/v/4OpgiNEyBVA

I almost couldnt watch the whole thing!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-07-2012, 05:18 PM
 
477 posts, read 364,994 times
Reputation: 139
Did the interviewer mention that quite a few if not damn near all Republicans voted for the NDAA?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2012, 05:22 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 21,994,436 times
Reputation: 5455
Looked like the old guy wanted to be left the hell alone myself. Some partisan hack comes around bugging me on my day off with a mic and camera I'd tell him to go to hell. Guy showed some restraint IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2012, 05:31 PM
 
Location: So Cal
52,193 posts, read 52,623,070 times
Reputation: 52689
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Looked like the old guy wanted to be left the hell alone myself. Some partisan hack comes around bugging me on my day off with a mic and camera I'd tell him to go to hell. Guy showed some restraint IMO.
Kind of what I was thinking too. He probably was just saying that to get the guy to leave him alone.... IDK....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2012, 05:32 PM
 
371 posts, read 443,188 times
Reputation: 700
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Looked like the old guy wanted to be left the hell alone myself. Some partisan hack comes around bugging me on my day off with a mic and camera I'd tell him to go to hell. Guy showed some restraint IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2012, 01:24 AM
 
Location: Too far from home.
8,732 posts, read 6,778,885 times
Reputation: 2374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dude111 View Post
This is one example of a totally BRAINWASHED SHEEPLE IDIOT!!!!

www.youtube.com/v/4OpgiNEyBVA

I almost couldnt watch the whole thing!!
Are you referring to the guy doing the interview?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2012, 01:47 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,440,440 times
Reputation: 6541
This is just another partisan hack who has never bothered even read NDAA, and I am not referring to the Obama supporter being interviewed. For an Obama supporter the interviewee was incredibly tolerant. I would not be as tolerant in a similar situation.

For one thing the moron interviewer did not know that NDAA passed Congress with a veto-proof majority. No President is stupid enough to veto any bill that passes Congress with a veto-proof majority. For another thing, this is exactly the same practice we have used in every war we have ever fought. POWs are arrested and detained, without trial, for an indefinite period (typically until after the war is over).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2012, 01:57 AM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,558,961 times
Reputation: 4262
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Looked like the old guy wanted to be left the hell alone myself. Some partisan hack comes around bugging me on my day off with a mic and camera I'd tell him to go to hell. Guy showed some restraint IMO.
What are you talking about, they guy asked him if he would answer a few questions and the guy said yes. This is your typical Obama supporter, totally clueless, just like their leader.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2012, 02:16 AM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,558,961 times
Reputation: 4262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
This is just another partisan hack who has never bothered even read NDAA, and I am not referring to the Obama supporter being interviewed. For an Obama supporter the interviewee was incredibly tolerant. I would not be as tolerant in a similar situation.

For one thing the moron interviewer did not know that NDAA passed Congress with a veto-proof majority. No President is stupid enough to veto any bill that passes Congress with a veto-proof majority. For another thing, this is exactly the same practice we have used in every war we have ever fought. POWs are arrested and detained, without trial, for an indefinite period (typically until after the war is over).
The act authorizes the military in Title X, Subtitle D, entitled “Counter-Terrorism,” for the first time in more than 200 years, to carry out domestic policing. With this bill, which will take effect March 3, the military can indefinitely detain without trial any U.S. citizen deemed to be a terrorist or an accessory to terrorism. And suspects can be shipped by the military to our offshore penal colony in Guantanamo Bay and kept there until “the end of hostilities.” It is a catastrophic blow to civil liberties.
Chris Hedges: Why I’m Suing Barack Obama - Chris Hedges' Columns - Truthdig

until the end of hostilities? Like that's going to happen.
Who are terrorists? anybody they say they are, including Ron Paul supporters, militias, people that are buying survival food, tea party, associating with anti-government types - whatever happened to freedom of association?
It's not just Obama and his supporters, Romney likes this bill too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2012, 02:40 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,440,440 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
The act authorizes the military in Title X, Subtitle D, entitled “Counter-Terrorism,” for the first time in more than 200 years, to carry out domestic policing.
Not true. The military was used to enforce domestic law until Congress enacted the Posse Comitatus Act in 1878. Congress further modified the Posse Comitatus Act in 1980 to allow the military to enforce federal drug laws. Lastly, Congress modified the Posse Comitatus Act in 2007 to allow the military to be used to enforce domestic law in the event of an emergency, natural disaster, or terrorist attack.

Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
With this bill, which will take effect March 3, the military can indefinitely detain without trial any U.S. citizen deemed to be a terrorist or an accessory to terrorism.
Incorrect, again. Only those members of al Qaeda or the Taliban, with whom we are at war, can be arrested and detained without charge, whether they are US citizens or not. Just as we have done in every war we have ever fought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
And suspects can be shipped by the military to our offshore penal colony in Guantanamo Bay and kept there until “the end of hostilities.” It is a catastrophic blow to civil liberties.
Chris Hedges: Why I’m Suing Barack Obama - Chris Hedges' Columns - Truthdig
It is in accordance with the Fifth Amendment. You might try reading it sometime.

Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
until the end of hostilities? Like that's going to happen.
It will happen when Congress repeals Public Law 107-40.

Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
Who are terrorists? anybody they say they are, including Ron Paul supporters, militias, people that are buying survival food, tea party, associating with anti-government types - whatever happened to freedom of association?
The terrorists are members of al Qaeda and the Taliban, and just like with Jose Padilla, they have to prove before a federal judge (three judges in Padilla's case) that they are members of those terrorist organizations and a threat to public safety.

If you want to associate with al Qaeda and the Taliban terrorists, be my guest. But do not complain when you are given a furnished cell in GITMO or taken out by a drone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
It's not just Obama and his supporters, Romney likes this bill too.
Obama had no choice in the matter, Congress passed NDAA with a veto-proof majority. Of course Romney supports the bill, as do I. As would any rational individual, since this is exactly how we have done things for over 200 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top