Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-16-2012, 07:46 AM
 
458 posts, read 616,006 times
Reputation: 362

Advertisements

Currently, the tax brackets for a single person are as follows:

$0 to $8,700-----------------10%
$8,700 to $35,350------------15%
$35,350 to $85,650-----------25%
$85,650 to $178,650----------28%
$178,650 to $388,350---------33%
$388,350+--------------------35%

1) Do you believe that your rate is fair (whichever it may be)?
2) Do you believe that another brackets rate should change? Which one?
3) Assuming the current rate for the top bracket is not fair, what would be a "fair share" and how would we know when it is taxed enough?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-16-2012, 07:48 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,275,532 times
Reputation: 3826
"I don't know what the rich pay now, but it should be a 'fair share'. 'Fair share' is a number, right?"
"Paying taxes is patriotic"
"How else are you going to fund police - herp derp"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Central CT, sometimes FL and NH.
4,537 posts, read 6,795,938 times
Reputation: 5979
I'm in favor of simplifying taxes through a modified flat tax. One possibility is with two tiers. 1st $20,000 - 5%. Everything above $20,000 - 20%. Same rates for dividends and capital gains. No deductions, automatically withheld through payroll taxes or electronic monthly submissions. Everyone has some skin in the game.

Washington must work with the revenue received which would include a defined % of revenue received to pay down debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 08:03 AM
 
Location: Florida
77,005 posts, read 47,597,802 times
Reputation: 14806
I'd be OK removing loopholes and lowering rates, especially at corporate level, but that approach has already been shot down by the GOP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,756,720 times
Reputation: 24863
I think that a fair share of taxes is completely dependent on how much you have beyond a 'reasonable comfort level". Accordingly I propose an Income tax and a personal property tax. The income tax would be on all income from all sources over the 90th percentile. The tax would be progressive and increase proportionately to the citizen’s percentile until 99%. In addition there would be a similar tax on all personal real and financial property no matter where located, deposited or held.

The primary effect of these taxes will be to place the financial responsibility of maintaining our country on the people that realize a disproportionate income or own a disproportionate amount of the country. It would also relieve most of the people from the burden of taxation and they would then be free to spend or invest the money as they desired. Some would just buy more stuff but many would start their own businesses realizing they would not be liable for taxes until well into the six figure personal income. That is well into the reasonable comfort income range.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 08:04 AM
 
45,201 posts, read 26,417,923 times
Reputation: 24964
Loopholes for everyone and lets decrease the size of our obese fed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 08:18 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,756,720 times
Reputation: 24863
The tax method I suggested does not have any loopholes. I am also, as corporations are now legally people, considering applying the same tax rates to undistributed profits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 08:19 AM
Status: "119 N/A" (set 19 days ago)
 
12,954 posts, read 13,665,225 times
Reputation: 9693
I wonder if some one in the field of nominative economics has come up with a rubric of sorts to access who uses tax dollars the most. For instance when I go walking I go to the "nice neighborhood " because the side walks are much better and if I go at night they are well lit. In the The poor part of town there are no side walks, but there has to be more police protection. In this case whose use of tax dollars are proportionally higher. The city gets more bang for the buck by keeping neighborhoods where property taxes are high well kept. So should we tax by zip code? I try not to complain but I do try to think of ways to get my money's worth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 08:22 AM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,473,858 times
Reputation: 14398
That chart is only for earned income but the chart is misleading. All your income isn't taxed at 28% if you earn $100k. You pay the lower rates on the amts under $85k.

-----------------

If you have investment/dividend income you pay much less in tax rates. 15% is the max rate no matter how much you make. This is why Romney paid a 14% tax rate for 2010. He probably paid much lower than this in prior years. This is why he is hiding his tax returns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 08:28 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 8,090,819 times
Reputation: 2971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
I'd be OK removing loopholes and lowering rates, especially at corporate level, but that approach has already been shot down by the GOP.
I would go for that. Some exemptions for small business' and investment, but very few and a lower rate. Corporate rates should go down, but not by much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top