Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-18-2012, 02:33 PM
 
2,546 posts, read 2,464,327 times
Reputation: 1350

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
If that person isn't doing anything to improve his/her situation, yes. No jobs where you are? Go somewhere else. Start your own small company offering services to fill a need, etc. Don't just sit there, say "poor me," and expect ever-increasing government handouts.

The U.S. Census sure seems to think they do. From their own data...

http://www.city-data.com/forum/22262778-post11.html
The census also seems to think we're talking about less than 3% of the population of females (Table 3). And that data isn't broken down in to subsets that might skew the data, such as age, education level, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-18-2012, 02:38 PM
 
2,546 posts, read 2,464,327 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
What I bolded is absolutely correct. The fact that a person works hard, is honest, etc. has nothing to do with fairness. It has to do with virtue, but we are not having a discussion on morality.

S**T happens and you deal with it. People who are successful don't make excuses when things go to hell, they find a way through it. The lazy/ignorant use poor circumstances as an excuse to sit there, collect a government check and do nothing about it.
As soon as we started discussing a flat tax, we automatically brought in morality. Even though it would be nice to have a discussion of what would be better for the country from an economic perspective, divorced from normative assertions, it's simply not going to happen.

In this country, there is a belief that willpower is all you need to get ahead. The premise, then, is those who succeed did so because they asserted themselves, and those who failed simply didn't try hard enough. But, this flies in the face of behavioral sciences and decades of data.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 02:42 PM
 
4,911 posts, read 3,429,454 times
Reputation: 1257
Cons love the flat tax because it means a tax cut for the rich and a tax increase for the poor
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 02:44 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,204,453 times
Reputation: 5481
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkeconomist View Post
As soon as we started discussing a flat tax, we automatically brought in morality. Even though it would be nice to have a discussion of what would be better for the country from an economic perspective, divorced from normative assertions, it's simply not going to happen.

In this country, there is a belief that willpower is all you need to get ahead. The premise, then, is those who succeed did so because they asserted themselves, and those who failed simply didn't try hard enough. But, this flies in the face of behavioral sciences and decades of data.
How is flat tax a conversation on morality? It is an issue of justice, not morality. Every person paying the same percentage is fair. Any progressive tax system is imposing morality on people's financial situations. A person should pay for what they use. Period. That is a simple statement. And obviously there is an element of luck involved in getting ahead, but there is ABSOLUTELY data that shows trying harder dramatically increases your chances of success. Only 11% of all wealth of millionaires in this country was inherited. Is hard work the only factor that contributes to success? Obviously not. No one has ever made that claim (and that is what your 'decades of data' proves to be the case). There is also decades of data that shows that to a large extent a person makes their own luck.

So tell me, what are you going to do with your time today where you aren't at your job? Read, hang out with friends, or study to improve yourself in your field? One of those three options will increase your chances of success. Can you guess which one it is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 02:46 PM
 
4,911 posts, read 3,429,454 times
Reputation: 1257
And please do shove that no more tax breaks or tax loopholes bull****. You know as well as I do that would last about a week.

Especially the tax loophole. Do you even know what a loophole is? It's a mistake. Something that wasn't mean to be in there but is, often because terms aren't defined or defined too loosely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 02:47 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
What I bolded is absolutely correct. The fact that a person works hard, is honest, etc. has nothing to do with fairness. It has to do with virtue, but we are not having a discussion on morality.

S**T happens and you deal with it. People who are successful don't make excuses when things go to hell, they find a way through it. The lazy/ignorant use poor circumstances as an excuse to sit there, collect a government check and do nothing about it.
Surely we do not have to remind you about the bank bailouts do we?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 02:48 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,204,453 times
Reputation: 5481
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv View Post
Cons love the flat tax because it means a tax cut for the rich and a tax increase for the poor
Or people favor a flat tax because economically it will create a system which brings this country out of debt, and will make an individual responsible for their own lives.

Are you against working towards either of those two goals?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 02:49 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,204,453 times
Reputation: 5481
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Surely we do not have to remind you about the bank bailouts do we?
I was, and still am, vehemently against the bank bailouts. What does that have to do with the topic at hand?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 02:58 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
I was, and still am, vehemently against the bank bailouts. What does that have to do with the topic at hand?
It disputes the idea that the "successful" don't come running to the government when bad things happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 03:07 PM
 
2,546 posts, read 2,464,327 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
How is flat tax a conversation on morality?
It is a conversation on morality because $1000 means something different to the bottom 1% than to the top 1%. So, while a flat tax is both easier to understand and more equal in terms of % of income paid, it is not more equal in terms of ability to pay. So, a person who earns $20k would pay $2k at a 10% flat tax, while a person who earns $1 million would pay out $100,000. That $2k means a lot more to the person earning $20k than the $100,000 does to the millionaire. Because of this, it becomes a question of fairness, of ability to pay.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
And obviously there is an element of luck involved in getting ahead, but there is ABSOLUTELY data that shows trying harder dramatically increases your chances of success. Only 11% of all wealth of millionaires in this country was inherited. Is hard work the only factor that contributes to success? Obviously not. No one has ever made that claim (and that is what your 'decades of data' proves to be the case). There is also decades of data that shows that to a large extent a person makes their own luck.
Actually, based on the arguments in the C-D forums, a lot of members believe hard work is the determining factor in one's financial success. It is as if they have discounted concepts such as networks and luck: luck to have good genetics, or to be born in to the right family (does anyone really think a guy like Romney would have gotten where he was without his father, his father's money, or his father's connections?), to be born in the right area (a brilliant child in an awful neighborhood or school might not go anywhere, by no fault of the child).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top