Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-20-2012, 04:52 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,782,576 times
Reputation: 4174

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
How many innocent lives have to be lost to insane people with firearms before we do something?
What makes you think we can "do something"?

And how many of our rights will you take away, before you finally realize we can't "do anything" and your huge violations were all for naught?

And what assurances do we have that you will restore or rights after finding out how misguided and naive you were?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-20-2012, 04:55 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,947,486 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gungnir View Post
If we're not comparing crimes, then there is no need for any additional screening on firearms purchases. If someone uses a firearm in a criminal manner it's a crime, and can be reactively punished. In the post you're referring too, DWI is reactively punished, however there are hundreds of deaths a year caused by people DWI, if we proactively screened car purchasers we might cut down the number of these deaths. This is the same position you're taking on firearms, but in relation to vehicle ownership.

I don't think you agree with taking that position on vehicles, so why do you take that position on firearms? If someone's drunk and mows down a line of 12 people waiting to see TDKR, you've got the same effect from a car as you had with someone with a gun.



You don't know that. You're assuming he's crazy, because you cannot imagine that anyone who is not crazy could act in the way he did. However it may well turn out that he is not crazy, Jeffrey Dahmer was adjudicated as sane, he killed around 20 or so people, injected some of their brains with sulphuric and hydrochloric acid while they were still alive, and ate parts of them, but he wasn't crazy. Which just goes to show, sometimes just because you think that what someone does is crazy, it doesn't mean that the person doing it is.
No, I use the DWI laws as a rebuttal for the premise that we should not enact laws simply because they don't catch everyone. I don't know how to make it any clearer.

Dahmer was found fit to stand trial. There is a difference. He was also found that he was capable of understanding right from wrong. These are different standards. He may have actually failed a mental health exam. I would hope so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2012, 05:02 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,258,323 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
However, even if there was an issue, which I don't believe there is, an amendment could fix that.

May I ask you to explain exactly what it would take to amend the Constitution?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2012, 05:05 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,947,486 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
May I ask you to explain exactly what it would take to amend the Constitution?
do you not know how to use google?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2012, 05:08 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,258,323 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
do you not know how to use google?

Yes, I do. Evidently though, you do not or you cannot understand the process with is quite extensive and very long.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2012, 05:10 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,472,256 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
I don't think it would be too big of a deal to require everyone who wants to purchase a gun to be required to have a mental health screening. It is quite possible that we could identify some of the deranged people purchasing guns and reduce the possibility of what happened in Colorado from happening again.
No.

[besides, even mentally fit people can kill]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2012, 05:16 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,947,486 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
Yes, I do. Evidently though, you do not or you cannot understand the process with is quite extensive and very long.
I do understand what is required to amend the constitution, although difficult it is not impossible. The thread is not about how difficult would it be to have these laws passed, but whether they should be in fact passed. As I said before, I don't think the law would be unconstitutional as we have already found laws that denied felons the right to own firearms to be constitutional. So it really is a moot point; however, even it were there is still a mechanism to make it Constitutional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2012, 05:21 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,837,332 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebnllnb View Post
I question the general populace's need to own automatic or semi-automatic weapons. Or at the very least reduce the ammunition capacity of these weapons.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebnllnb View Post
I guess sport takes president over human life.
really? apparently you have never been in a gun fight or you would never be making statements like these.

Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
So everyone should be armed at all times in public in order to protect themselves from the insane?
why not? i also believe that law abiding citizens should be armed to protect themselves against criminals also.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
How many innocent lives have to be lost to insane people with firearms before we do something?
how many innocent lives have to be lost to gangbangers and other criminals before people start shooting back at these idiots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
I don't believe there is a Constitutional problem. You can place restrictions on constitutional rights. Not all speech is protected under the constitution, and the restriction that felons not be allowed to own firearms has been found constitutional. This is certainly no different than not allowing felons to own firearms. However, even if there was an issue, which I don't believe there is, an amendment could fix that.
the reason there is no infringement of the second amendment in regards to criminals is because the criminals have lost their constitutional rights due to a felony conviction, and thus they can be forbidden from firearms ownership. same with the mentally incompetent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2012, 05:26 PM
 
Location: The #1 sunshine state, Arizona.
12,169 posts, read 17,645,971 times
Reputation: 64104
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
All very good questions that an enacted law would need to address.
Do you think the criminals are going to obey the gun laws?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2012, 05:28 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,442,508 times
Reputation: 6465
I had an extremely loving good dear friend in the 90's. I loved her so very much, she was such a good person.

The person who killed her broke into her home, awoke her, and shot her in the head. It was later known, that the suspect murderer, found a old old gun, put it together, and that is what he used to kill her. How i wish i knew.


He then proceeded to do evil things to her body, stole her wallet, and got a bite to eat. He was mental, and when he realized what he had done in prison, he later killed himself.

I do believe you can be the most sane person, and something can trigger an emotion, that makes an otherwise sane person go crazy. And there are many mental people out there, not getting the medical attention they desperatly need.

That day still today, is etched in my heart, with such sorrow.

And i went thru such a period of anger, real anger, wanting to know why. I WAS mad at everyone everywhere. It took a long time before i got over that grief that should never had happened.

It came to the point that the anger was consuming a part of me, i did not even know, and i knew that was not good for my being emotionally, and that is when i started to grieve in the right sense of the way, and i then realized, i could not let that situation, consume my whole being.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top