Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Private FFs compensated by insurance companies would be ALOT cheaper than the govt employees doing the job now. Competition would create a market that would drive down costs
Private FFs compensated by insurance companies would be ALOT cheaper than the govt employees doing the job now. Competition would create a market that would drive down costs
Do you have a cite for that proposition? The fact is if the insurance company came to the conclusion that it would be cheaper to allow a home to burn vs. putting out the fire based on distance to the location, that is what they would do.
Do you have a cite for that proposition? The fact is if the insurance company came to the conclusion that it would be cheaper to allow a home to burn vs. putting out the fire based on distance to the location, that is what they would do.
All I need is two private FF companies that want to put out the fire. The market will take care of the rest
The only insurance company that would be interested in putting out the home fire is the insurance company that insures that home. Like I said, if it was cheaper to let it burn then they would.
Still, baby, simple solution. Get off the computer, get a job, become elite...
Then you can laugh at us poor folk, too....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.