Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Are we better off economically since the Bush tax cuts?
Yes 23 31.08%
No 51 68.92%
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-05-2012, 09:00 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,966,662 times
Reputation: 7315

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Raising a child is very expensive.
Something that should be considered before conceiving.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2012, 09:01 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,808,661 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
4.6 percent unemployment as of Dec, 2006.
The unemployment rate was below 4% when Bush took office.



US labor statics for September indicate of those considering a new career, 40% use networking as their single source of job searches. « imatters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2012, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
9,394 posts, read 15,690,230 times
Reputation: 6262
And what followed soon after? The burst of the dot-com bubble. Natural UE is around 5%, lower than that isn't necessarily better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2012, 09:04 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,171,483 times
Reputation: 7875
I would love to see us go back to the tax levels during the Clinton era.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2012, 09:06 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,808,661 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
Something that should be considered before conceiving.
That is called birth control. However, financial situations can change after the birth of a child.

Are you in favor of tax deductions and credits only for the wealthy, such as Mitt Romney?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2012, 09:09 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,966,662 times
Reputation: 7315
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
That is called birth control. However, financial situations can change after the birth of a child.

Are you in favor of tax deductions and credits only for the wealthy, such as Mitt Romney?
I'm in favor of an absolute flat tax on all income.no deductions.no exemptions.no EITC.paid from dollar one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2012, 09:25 PM
 
1,389 posts, read 1,312,670 times
Reputation: 287
Who thinks this country been better off since he fed reserve act of 1913? Now that's a real question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2012, 09:46 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,000,960 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by HurricaneDC View Post
And what followed soon after? The burst of the dot-com bubble. Natural UE is around 5%, lower than that isn't necessarily better.
That chart shows pretty good what occurred after the dot com bubble popped and then the housing bubble. Now we have the mother of all bubbles the government bubble ready to pop. The chart won't be turning back up after that one. Nobody seems to care though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2012, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,884,808 times
Reputation: 11259
Obama seems to believe cutting the SS tax was good for the economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2012, 10:17 PM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,003 posts, read 12,588,356 times
Reputation: 8921
>I'm in favor of an absolute flat tax on all income.no deductions.no exemptions.no EITC.paid from dollar one.<

Intersting POV. However, a family of 4 with 30K income does not get half the "marginal utility of life" that the 60K income family gets. It is very difficult to quantify the unquantifiable but for example:

The 60K family wont live next to a drug dealer or twenty, drive a POS car, live in a neighborhood where cops dont bother showing up for anything less than a body in the middle of the street....

still amused by those who still ignore payroll taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top