Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-28-2012, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
Your justification for saying that every sex offender has "ruined someone's life" would be what, exactly?



Leaving aside the fact that many people do care personally about the welfare of RSOs--their family, friends, and in many cases even victims--a society that sows the wind of cruelty and brutality will reap the whirlwind.
Correct. We have regressed 300 years with the RSO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-28-2012, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by DontH8Me View Post
And when did we start calling sex with a child consensual?
When two 17 year old kids have consensual sex, it's consensual. What's so hard to understand about that? You like ruining their lives forever for having sex?

And by the way, millions of kids from every social group in America have sex. They just don't all get caught and prosecuted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2012, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,473,557 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by mustangman66 View Post
I was never referring to statutory rape, where the bf may have been 18 and the gf 17. Im referring to rapists, molesters, pedophiles, etc..
And what would be the exact dividing line there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2012, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by DontH8Me View Post
So your thinking is, if a 12 year old does not resist sexual advances, she is a willing participant? Do you think it is normal for someone to find a prepubescent child sexually attractive?
It's normal for teenagers to want to have sex and millions do it every year. Have you been living on Mars?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2012, 04:26 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donna-501 View Post
Are you are aware that some don't sign up for the registry and just disappear?

I suspect the real bad ones don't sign up. Or maybe it's the smart ones who disappear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2012, 04:28 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,473,557 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
I suspect the real bad ones don't sign up.
The worst ones are usually either kept in prison until they have the sex drive of a plate of cold spaghetti, or they haven't been caught at all yet. In any of those cases the registry is no help at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2012, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,473,557 times
Reputation: 4185
This is a great page I just discovered:

http://www.endsexcrime.org/theproof.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2012, 04:29 PM
 
Location: NH
4,206 posts, read 3,755,177 times
Reputation: 6749
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
And what would be the exact dividing line there?
Court.

And the ones that dont fit that description should have a trap door open up underneath them so that they could fall into a big meat grinder and be done with. I am not sensitive to people that dont derseve to breath the same air as everyone else. Cruel and unusual...very...just the way it should be with these types of people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2012, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,473,557 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by mustangman66 View Post
Cruel and unusual...very...just the way it should be with these types of people.
Glad to see you are open in your contempt for our Constitution and way of life...keep it up
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2012, 04:40 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogead View Post
The majority of registered sex offenders weren't convicted of anything involving children. Many of these offenders were convicted of behaviors which were totally non-violent and which were questionable as to their legitimate classification as sex crimes in the first place ("sexting", public nudity, consensual sexual contact between teenagers, etc.).

If someone has served their prison sentence, that should be the end of the matter unless they are psychologically incapable of safely being integrated into society again. If that is the case, they need to be confined until they no longer pose a danger to the public. These cases are rare. There are some state treatment programs designed for individuals who have finished their prison sentences. Unfortunately, these programs are often equatable with imprisonment itself.

If the idea is to protect society from violent sexual predators, we need to ask why dangerous individuals are released from confinement at all. We could just as easily ask that question concerning released criminals who were incarcerated for non sex-related crimes.

Our current fascination with sex offender registries is, for the most part, a result of repressed and unhealthy sexual attitudes meeting up with paranoia.
And some are on the list for reasons totally unrelated to sex.

THIS LAW RUINS LIVES and protects nobody.

Here is a good example;

New Jersey – Here’s a classic example of why some of us get a bit worried whenever laws named after children are passed. Two New Jersey teens were 14-years-old when they sat on the faces of 11-year-old and 12-year-old schoolmates, with their naked asses. Why? Because they are 14 and stupid. But because of Megan’s Law, these two teens will have to register as sex offenders for the rest of their lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top