It is very fun to point out the 'Red states vote Republican for tax cuts, and then take the taxes from Democrats' Irony, but it is somewhat a comparison of economies and demographics. It is interesting that rural=Republican while urban=Democrat.
Rural economies have low populations but high amounts of agriculture (which of course means agricultural subsidies) so that tends to 'over-represent' in terms of taxes. I personally don't agree with our farm subsidies (and you can debate the effectiveness--separate issue), but the nation as a whole yields the results of a subsidy.
I would wonder what the results of a comparison of tax dollars spent per state would be? Blue states are more populous and it is possible that every area has a steady base-line of "recipients" and cities just have many more "non-subsidy" folks to help pay for it all.
Sorry if I am a bit rambly.. I'm on the 4th glass of booze and all...
