Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-13-2012, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,875,047 times
Reputation: 11259

Advertisements

At least when it comes to foreign policy:


With the Cold War ending, we should look, too, with a cold eye on the international set, never at a loss for new ideas to divert US wealth and power into crusades and causes having little or nothing to do with the true national interest of the United States. High among these is the democratist temptation [free the world], the worship of democracy as a form of governance and the concomitant ambition to see all mankind embrace it, or explain why not. Like all idolatries, democratism substitutes a false god for the real, a love of process[political pragmatism] for a love of country. The true national interests of the United States are not to be found in some hegemonic and utopian world order. Bush holds global democracy as a goal. This is a formula for endless conflict. “
Source: Where The Right Went Wrong, by Pat Buchanan, p. 13-17&34-35 , Sep 1, 2004
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-13-2012, 07:14 PM
 
1,058 posts, read 1,263,298 times
Reputation: 560
he's a blowhard (and has definitely some racial tendancies) but he is right on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2012, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,875,047 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by mufc1878 View Post
he's a blowhard (and has definitely some racial tendancies) but he is right on this.
Pat is so wrong on some issues, but when it comes to foreign policy there is no one I agree with more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2012, 07:33 PM
 
20,699 posts, read 19,340,722 times
Reputation: 8278
Pat is solid on foreign policy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2012, 07:45 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,875,047 times
Reputation: 11259
Pat Buchanan from "Who Lost the Middle East"

Quote:
And should a new wave of revolts sweep the region, we might see the final collapse of the neoconservative foreign policy of George W. Bush
.
That Mideast policy rested on several pillars: uncritical support of Israel, invasions to oust enemies in Afghanistan and Iraq, and U.S. occupations to rebuild and convert these nations into democracies.

Well before he left office, these policies had made the region so anti-American that Bush was himself, in opinion surveys, viewed less favorably by the Muslim masses than Osama bin Laden.

And when Bush, having declared at his 2005 inaugural that his goal was now to "end tyranny in our world," called for elections in the Middle East, he got the results his policies had produced.

In Palestine, Hamas swept to power. In Lebanon, Hezbollah made such gains it was brought into the Lebanese government it has just brought down. When Egypt's Hosni Mubarak allowed some electoral districts to be contested, the Muslim Brotherhood won most of them.
Obama is following the same policy and getting the same results.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2012, 08:14 PM
 
11,531 posts, read 10,284,243 times
Reputation: 3580
You mean Hitler's foreign policy???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2012, 08:23 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,875,047 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savoir Faire View Post
You mean Hitler's foreign policy???
A truly idiotic response.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2012, 08:25 PM
 
11,531 posts, read 10,284,243 times
Reputation: 3580
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
A truly idiotic response.
Didn't Buchanan praise Hitler???

There are so many other notable writers who have made sound foreign policy analysis, why pick a racist crackpot like Buchanan?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2012, 08:33 PM
 
Location: Dallas
613 posts, read 1,054,278 times
Reputation: 557
second
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2012, 08:40 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
5,864 posts, read 4,975,892 times
Reputation: 4207
Go Pat Go! I don't agree with Pat's protectionism in trade or his social conservatism but I certainly admire his foreign policy stances.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top