Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-14-2012, 08:45 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,715,346 times
Reputation: 853

Advertisements

Obama Cuts $2 Million from Protection of Foreign Missions, $129 Million form Embassy Security | The Weekly Standard


The researchers at the Republican National Committee notice this alarming fact in President Obama's sequestration plan:
Obama’s Sequestration Plan Would Cut $1.084 Billion From The State Department’s Diplomatic And Consular Program, Including $2 Million For The Protection Of Foreign Missions And Officials, And $129 Million For Embassy Security, Construction, And Maintenance. (“OMB Report Pursuant To The Sequestration Transparency Act Of 2012,” Office Of Management And Budget, pp. 135-136, 9/14/12)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-15-2012, 06:58 AM
 
30,063 posts, read 18,663,011 times
Reputation: 20880
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
Obama Cuts $2 Million from Protection of Foreign Missions, $129 Million form Embassy Security | The Weekly Standard


The researchers at the Republican National Committee notice this alarming fact in President Obama's sequestration plan:
Obama’s Sequestration Plan Would Cut $1.084 Billion From The State Department’s Diplomatic And Consular Program, Including $2 Million For The Protection Of Foreign Missions And Officials, And $129 Million For Embassy Security, Construction, And Maintenance. (“OMB Report Pursuant To The Sequestration Transparency Act Of 2012,” Office Of Management And Budget, pp. 135-136, 9/14/12)
Well.............. there is one embassy in Libya he does not need to defend anymore, as it is destroyed and its occupants killed. Think of all the money Obama will save! I am sure he will blow those savings in two minutes on some "treats for votes" scheme for illegals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2012, 07:02 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,853,377 times
Reputation: 4585
Congress bipartisan failure to deal with the Fiscal problem, is Obama's fault?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2012, 07:58 AM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,769,934 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Congress bipartisan failure to deal with the Fiscal problem, is Obama's fault?
Everything is Obama's fault to some. The government spends money, Obama's fault. The government cuts spending, Obama's fault.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2012, 08:21 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,715,346 times
Reputation: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Congress bipartisan failure to deal with the Fiscal problem, is Obama's fault?

It seems to me that had Obama followed the advice of HIS OWN Debt Commission, sequestration would have never came to pass.

By the way, I also posted that the WH has now admitted that the defense cuts are dangerous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2012, 08:54 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Everything is Obama's fault to some. The government spends money, Obama's fault. The government cuts spending, Obama's fault.
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Congress bipartisan failure to deal with the Fiscal problem, is Obama's fault?
The hypocracy in you two jumping up and down and blaming Bush for all of our problems, but never blaming Obama for anything, is duly noted...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2012, 09:01 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,715,346 times
Reputation: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
The hypocracy in you two jumping up and down and blaming Bush for all of our problems, but never blaming Obama for anything, is duly noted...

Hahahahahahahaha!!!

I can't rep you enough for that one!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2012, 09:07 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,715,346 times
Reputation: 853
Sequester would cut $11 billion from Medicare

Sequestration would cut $11 billion from Medicare and take millions of dollars away from Affordable Care Act implementation programs.

The Obama administration released its highly anticipated report Friday on the effects of sequestration — a blunt-force budget-cutting tool that Congress created when it raised the country's debt ceiling.

The sequester would make deep cuts to defense spending as well as domestic programs. Medicare payments to doctors, hospitals and other healthcare providers would take an across-the-board 2 percent cut. That would come out to roughly $11 billion, according to the administration's report.


The sequester would also make significant cuts to programs created by the Affordable Care Act, which are not subject to the 2 percent cap.







Grants to help states establish insurance exchanges — new marketplaces for private insurance coverage — would lose $66 million, the administration said. The law's prevention and public health fund would lose $76 million

Overall "program management" at the agency that oversees Medicare and Medicaid would be cut by more than $60 million if the automatic spending cuts are allowed to go into effect.

Congress exempted Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program from the sequester, but other healthcare programs would have to absorb big hits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2012, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,947,200 times
Reputation: 5661
Another day, another "Obama is bad" thread from jt800.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2012, 09:12 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,715,346 times
Reputation: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Another day, another "Obama is bad" thread from jt800.
Gee......I'd actually lend that statement a little bit of credibility IF you EVER posted anything similar on the "Romney is bad" threads.

However, you just proved your own hypocrisy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top