Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Drawing on the expertise of 10 distinguished historians—spanning several generations—Newsweek’s upcoming special issue ranks the 10 best presidents since 1900.
This is going to explode some brains. I am not surprised that historians are already placing Obama among the ten best. Considering what he has accomplished against unbelievable obstruction and bias is going to give him an impressive legacy.
This is going to explode some brains. I am not surprised that historians are already placing Obama among the ten best. Considering what he has accomplished against unbelievable obstruction and bias is going to give him an impressive legacy.
Well now there's some timely, objective unbiased reporting! That's precisely why I don't read that rag.
And I may just vote for Obama, only because the alternative is worse!
This is going to explode some brains. I am not surprised that historians are already placing Obama among the ten best. Considering what he has accomplished against unbelievable obstruction and bias is going to give him an impressive legacy.
Certainly, President Obama belongs there.
But to keep things in perspective, there have only been 20 Presidents since 1900. So "Top 10" is simply "top half". Personally, I think history will kindly judge the President that lead the United States out of the Great Recession, began national health care, got us out of the Iraq debacle and decimated al-Qaeda. I'm just saying that inclusion in "Best 10 out of 20" alone isn't a great achievement (though the top, let's say, four, from that list will be 'great' or 'near great' Presidents, and after we've had a few decades for history to assess all these Presidents, I believe President Obama will probably be in that elite top four).
Well now there's some timely, objective unbiased reporting! That's precisely why I don't read that rag.
And I may just vote for Obama, only because the alternative is worse!
I'm not a huge supporter of Romney either, but when you consider the cumulative results of the Obama administration, I just can't vote for Obama. I will be voting for Romney.
8 out of 10 "best" presidents were Democrats. LOL. No bias on the part of the loony liberals who picked the "best."
And there have only been 20 presidents since 1900, so I'm not sure being 10th is some sort of ringing endorsement. Also laughable is the fact that Dwight Eisenhower is nowhere to be found on the list.
This is going to explode some brains. I am not surprised that historians are already placing Obama among the ten best. Considering what he has accomplished against unbelievable obstruction and bias is going to give him an impressive legacy.
I don't even have to read the article to know thats a joke. And people say the mainstream media isn't liberal.
This from the magazine that sold recently for $1. Not the magazine itself, mind you, but the entire company sold for $1.
They're literally worthless.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
