Quote:
Originally Posted by Xanathos
I'd vote for Paul in a heartbeat. Nobody since Perot would have had a chance to win as an independent like he does.
If I thought there was even a .00001% chance of it working, I'd vote for Gary Johnson, even though I don't totally line up to his beliefs. It'd just be nice to break this 2 party system which is obviously not working.
Bloomberg.....if you had asked me a few years ago, I would have said yes. But now that I see him banning sodas, trying to ban infant formula to force women into breastfeeding, and all the other nanny state crap he's doing, no way.
|
It is not really about the third party candidate winning, it is about scaring the hell out of Wall St by showing a decent turnout. Ross Perot scared government so badly they damn near balanced the Federal Budget during Clinton's administration because they were afraid the people were actually starting to understand what Perot was saying.
The effects were felt across the whole economy from a strengthening dollar to $.99 cent gas.
The third party candidate does not have to win to cause change. Ross Perot only got 15% of the vote, but that was enough to get the powers that be goose stepping.
Please make your vote count - vote 3rd party!