Obama has blood on his hands. denied requests for Libya security! (deaths, treason)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Did the president who ignored the warnings about hijackers using a plane in a terrorist attack have to resign? More than 4 were killed if you`ll recall. That`s right. Bush did it.
It's a simple formula for Obama and fans:
Something negative: It's not my fault (or it's George Bush's fault)
Something positive: I did that!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus
really? did you also fail to read the AP article?
Yes, I read it. I had edited to add this right after I posted too early - my bad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1
Among military officers there is a saying: You can delegate responsibility but never accountability. As Commander-in-Chief, our president should be held to the same standard.
But this explains my reasoning and frustration. If something that costs lives occurs on a military commander's watch that was a result of a subordinate's actions, the military commander will still be held accountable. We have had many a friend over the years be relieved of command for a subordinate's actions or lack there of, on things much less grievous than this.
We ALL read it and it's OBAMA'S State Department just as it was George Bush's Pentagon when prisoners at Abu Grhaib were allegedly abused.
the US State Department is run by many individuals of VARIOUS political beliefs. They are headed by the Secretary of State, who is the sole person responsible for dealing with affairs internally in the US and in foreign countries.
No, you did not read it. And you show yet again, that you don't know how government works.
Did the president who ignored the warnings about hijackers using a plane in a terrorist attack have to resign? More than 4 were killed if you`ll recall. That`s right. Bush did it.
Debunked LONG ago. The Congressional Report on 911 proved that untrue.
But IN THIS CASE we have the Embassy in Libya DIRECTLY requesting (not just a possible noise in the intelligence community) increased security and it being denied.
To make your lame attempt at an analogy work, you'd have to show that Bush was TOLD directly that airports needed higher security due to people having actual knowledge that planes were going to be hijacked and Bush denied that increase.
If you listen to these swooners its almost as if Obama hasn't been president the last four years somebody else has and Obama is running against that person. They are that blinded by their efforts to defend his actions.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
