Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-10-2012, 11:05 AM
 
Location: London UK & Florida USA
7,923 posts, read 8,846,511 times
Reputation: 2059

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
Wow....you really are a sad example for a Liberal.

You don't care about Americans being murdered by terrorists and now we find you don;t care about people losing good jobs and being forced to take multiple low wage jobs.
Let's see if we have this right........................
BUSH... (Republican) approx,800,000 job losses each month at the end of his term
OBAMA.. (Democrat) steady job growth virtually throughout his term in office and now unemployment to it's lowest level since January 2009.
We all hate hearing of terrorists killing American's and i'm sure both parties will do all they can to prevent it but please stop the silly blame game when terrorists attack us. If you really want to go down that road there are plenty of attacks and deaths during Bush's administration.... 9/11, SS Cole etc etc.
Low wages are in the hands of the employer.... not the Govt. plenty of great excuses though for employers to pay low wages since 2008..... many lost jobs because of the recession and now have jobs again..... the employers are the ones scurrying around looking for excuses NOT to pay decent salaries...
NOT Obama. I knew quite a few people before Obama became President who had to have 2/3 jobs because of extremely low pay....especially women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-10-2012, 01:24 PM
 
Location: Old Town Alexandria
14,492 posts, read 26,594,973 times
Reputation: 8971
Most small employers have never been able to afford health insurance for their employees.

Ive worked at Florida law firms where lawyers expect you to be covered by your spouse. This is how small businesses survive. Its not right, but its fact.

At job interviews they would even ask (which is actually illegal) if you "need health insurance" through their small firm.

I always got the better position by replying no, bcs I was covered by my husband.

This was 2001 btw. Health insurance is run amok, and small businessmen cannot afford it. It is just hitting home now bcs people want to blame obamacare. a red herring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2012, 01:27 PM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,241,253 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by CheyDee View Post
Darden tests limiting worker hours as health-care changes loom


"In an experiment apparently aimed at keeping down the cost of health-care reform, Orlando-based Darden Restaurants has stopped offering full-time schedules to many hourly workers in at least a few Olive Gardens, Red Lobsters and LongHorn Steakhouses."


"Analysts say many other companies, including the White Castle hamburger chain, are considering employing fewer full-timers because of key features of the Affordable Care Act scheduled to go into effect in 2014. Under that law, large companies must provide affordable health insurance to employees working an average of at least 30 hours per week."
You mean those Bush 43 tax cuts weren't for job creators to create jobs? I'm shocked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2012, 02:13 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,214,810 times
Reputation: 35013
Quote:
I'm a small business owner and i WANT to offer a good health care plan to my employees.
Give them the money you would otherwise pay for that "good health care plan" and let them buy their own "good health care plan" and not worry about loosing it if they loose their job with you or if your company tanks.

That is the goal...whatever we are doing now is just a step towards that goal. It's painful and will take awhile because people are fighting against it because (insert lame reason here) but there is NO REASON anyone should have to pay more for an individual policy than you pay for a policy for an employee. None. We are all in one big pool here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2012, 02:22 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,715,925 times
Reputation: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
Give them the money you would otherwise pay for that "good health care plan" and let them buy their own "good health care plan" and not worry about loosing it if they loose their job with you.

That is the goal...whatever we are doing now is just a step towards that goal. It's painful and will take awhile because people are fighting against it but there is NO REASON I should have to pay more for an individual policy than you pay for a policy for an employee. None.

: smack:


You obviously know nothing about how things work in a corporate environment.

Have you ever heard of getting a GROUP RATE because we are all (I have the same plan as my employees do) getting our health care cheaper because we are purchasing insurance at a bulk rate than what we would pay individually.

If I gave them each their part of what I pay for the group, they couldn't get the same level of health care coverage individually.

You also haven't addressed Obama's comment that it would cost $1-2 Trllion (quite a nice gap there huh?) start-up fees. He plans to cover that with his tax on the wealthy which the CBO says will only bring in a mere $68 Billion. Where's the rest of that money supposed to come from?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2012, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJiveMan View Post
You mean those Bush 43 tax cuts weren't for job creators to create jobs? I'm shocked.
Please make sure you don't whine when your income taxes go up January 1. That will only happen if Obama gets re-elected though. Yep, those Bush-Obama tax cuts extended to all who pay income taxes and you may well be one of them. I sure as hell am one of those who will see my taxes on my Social Security go up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2012, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamofmonterey View Post
Most small employers have never been able to afford health insurance for their employees.

Ive worked at Florida law firms where lawyers expect you to be covered by your spouse. This is how small businesses survive. Its not right, but its fact.

At job interviews they would even ask (which is actually illegal) if you "need health insurance" through their small firm.

I always got the better position by replying no, bcs I was covered by my husband.

This was 2001 btw. Health insurance is run amok, and small businessmen cannot afford it. It is just hitting home now bcs people want to blame obamacare. a red herring.
Well Walmart offers it, Target offers it, HEB (regional Texas supermarket) offers it, Denny's offers it, Rudy's BBQ offers it, Hollywood Video offered it (until they went bust).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2012, 03:48 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
Give them the money you would otherwise pay for that "good health care plan" and let them buy their own "good health care plan" and not worry about loosing it if they loose their job with you or if your company tanks.

That is the goal...whatever we are doing now is just a step towards that goal. It's painful and will take awhile because people are fighting against it because (insert lame reason here) but there is NO REASON anyone should have to pay more for an individual policy than you pay for a policy for an employee. None. We are all in one big pool here.
I think you see that the Obamacare rule about insurance is aimed at getting everybody under government insurance some day. Then we have that there single payer thing so everybody gets the same goodies.

Do you really fail to see what this whole thing is about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2012, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
Give them the money you would otherwise pay for that "good health care plan" and let them buy their own "good health care plan" and not worry about loosing it if they loose their job with you or if your company tanks.

That is the goal...whatever we are doing now is just a step towards that goal. It's painful and will take awhile because people are fighting against it because (insert lame reason here) but there is NO REASON anyone should have to pay more for an individual policy than you pay for a policy for an employee. None. We are all in one big pool here.
What is the goal ? The goal of Obamacare was to offer insurance to those that wanted to buy it but could not afford it or were denied coverage.

There was never any goal to get everyone off group health plans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2012, 03:51 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
: smack:


You obviously know nothing about how things work in a corporate environment.

Have you ever heard of getting a GROUP RATE because we are all (I have the same plan as my employees do) getting our health care cheaper because we are purchasing insurance at a bulk rate than what we would pay individually.

If I gave them each their part of what I pay for the group, they couldn't get the same level of health care coverage individually.

You also haven't addressed Obama's comment that it would cost $1-2 Trllion (quite a nice gap there huh?) start-up fees. He plans to cover that with his tax on the wealthy which the CBO says will only bring in a mere $68 Billion. Where's the rest of that money supposed to come from?
That other money will come from the rest of us once they prove that the rich can't handle it on their own.

Actually I am sure that very few progs really do understand how those systems work. My son says that he can't afford health insurance unless his employer raises his pay about $1k. Of course, he is pretty right leaning, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top