Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-23-2012, 07:51 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,698,996 times
Reputation: 22474

Advertisements

Marx: From those according to their abilities, to those according to their needs.

In Communism, it's not that there are no factories or businesses. They are not privately owned is the difference. Obama made it clear what he thinks of business ownership -- "if you own a business, you didn't build that business, others did".

Obama believes that the government is the reason for any business's existence. No one should get rich from owning a business, no one should financially profit from owning a business. The government should control not only the wealth, redistritute it as it decides, but the government should control the factories, the means of production. That's why it's not at all inconsistent that Obama would decide to have the government "invest" in big corporations using taxpayer money -- and his agenda definitely was to have the government gain some control over them in the process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-04-2012, 02:12 PM
 
9,848 posts, read 8,281,707 times
Reputation: 3296
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Marx: From those according to their abilities, to those according to their needs.

In Communism, it's not that there are no factories or businesses. They are not privately owned is the difference. Obama made it clear what he thinks of business ownership -- "if you own a business, you didn't build that business, others did".

Obama believes that the government is the reason for any business's existence. No one should get rich from owning a business, no one should financially profit from owning a business. The government should control not only the wealth, redistritute it as it decides, but the government should control the factories, the means of production. That's why it's not at all inconsistent that Obama would decide to have the government "invest" in big corporations using taxpayer money -- and his agenda definitely was to have the government gain some control over them in the process.

IMO Obama is closer to a Communist than Socialist, though most refer to him as a statist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2012, 02:25 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,048,770 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Obama made it clear what he thinks of business ownership -- "if you own a business, you didn't build that business, others did".

If you can't properly read a quotation I have no idea how you could ever get through the turgid writings of Karl Marx to have slightest clue as to what constitute Marxist theory.

Quote:
Obama believes that the government is the reason for any business's existence.
There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me -- because they want to give something back. They know they didn’t -- look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something -- there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there. (Applause.)

If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive.

Somebody invested in roads and bridges -- If you’ve got a business -- you didn’t build that.

[the "didn't build that refers to roads and bridges" he reiterates the point with the reference to the internet]

Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.
Why am I wasting my time with this
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2012, 07:22 PM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,695,729 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
If you can't properly read a quotation I have no idea how you could ever get through the turgid writings of Karl Marx to have slightest clue as to what constitute Marxist theory.



There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me -- because they want to give something back. They know they didn’t -- look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something -- there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there. (Applause.)

If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive.

Somebody invested in roads and bridges -- If you’ve got a business -- you didn’t build that.

[the "didn't build that refers to roads and bridges" he reiterates the point with the reference to the internet]

Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.
Why am I wasting my time with this
I don't know [shrug]. Maybe because you've bought into it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2012, 07:28 PM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,695,729 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjski View Post
By the same token, you can't look up the definition of intelligence, and expect to find...well...any condervatives in this forum that fit those definitions exactly.
Oh, and you do. Start with spelling the word correctly, then maybe we can talk about your blanket judgment of all who hold different views.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2012, 07:33 PM
 
Location: Lower east side of Toronto
10,564 posts, read 12,820,368 times
Reputation: 9400
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Marx: From those according to their abilities, to those according to their needs.

In Communism, it's not that there are no factories or businesses. They are not privately owned is the difference. Obama made it clear what he thinks of business ownership -- "if you own a business, you didn't build that business, others did".

Obama believes that the government is the reason for any business's existence. No one should get rich from owning a business, no one should financially profit from owning a business. The government should control not only the wealth, redistritute it as it decides, but the government should control the factories, the means of production. That's why it's not at all inconsistent that Obama would decide to have the government "invest" in big corporations using taxpayer money -- and his agenda definitely was to have the government gain some control over them in the process.
If this is true then Obama is about 30 years to late...There are no factories left. All production is been sent abroad. There is not much to control. Like all ideology geeks they get institutionalized at an early age. With institutional thought they go into a time freeze...the world moves on - things change..they stay the same and do not adapt. Ideology becomes like a religion. Real socialists and communists are live modestly...American ones like the finer things in life. I don't see any authentic commies in the picture..they might inflict their ideology on others but they will not walk the walk - they live in luxury and expect others to do with out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2012, 10:05 PM
 
27,141 posts, read 15,318,187 times
Reputation: 12071
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savoir Faire View Post
Obama gave almost a trillion dollars to Wall Street.

If you think that = Communism, then I have no time nor patience to school you.




That was a worthy goal.

That and the Goldman Sachs Administration he has.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top