Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-23-2012, 11:00 AM
 
17,468 posts, read 12,936,339 times
Reputation: 6763

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by actonbell View Post
Cutting off the head of that snake, just grew another one.
Actually, Bush allowed Bin Laden to produce 4 more children, with a 20 yr old no less.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-23-2012, 11:09 AM
Status: "It Can't Rain All The Time" (set 29 days ago)
 
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,593,334 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3~Shepherds View Post
Actually, Bush allowed Bin Laden to produce 4 more children, with a 20 yr old no less.
lol That's not what I meant, but you knew that didn't you.

Some one took Laden's place. I didn't look at it hard enough to say the who name. But I know, there is a new leader among them and that all that was accomplished in killing Laden was giving them more to be mad at us about. However, it isn't like they need an excuse. They seem to be making up those excuses as they go along.

~sigh~

That bad part about that is the American people who believe the excuses, as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2012, 11:21 AM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,530,402 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by actonbell View Post
Bush didn't want Bin Laden. I don't know why, but I believe that Obama going after him, the way he did, was a huge mistake. Seeing as how nothing is really disclosed on this, one is only left to speculate as to why Bush's strategy Laden was to be left alone.
Bush was interested in the Iraq war and not getting Bin Laden.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2012, 01:02 PM
 
Location: State of Superior
8,733 posts, read 15,938,824 times
Reputation: 2869
Quote:
Originally Posted by actonbell View Post
Originally Posted by actonbell


So from this one can conclude that when something is to be done the lobbyist go to the President (traveling up the chain) and says, we need an executive order that will say change citizens privacy laws so they are less, the housing bubble to pop, the ball outs to begin, etc...and the President does it?

Is that how it is that we blame the President for all that ails the American dream?
Of coarse not and you know it....Aw maybe when Cheeny was running things and there was a lot being set behind closed doors. For the most part, the K street guys get to know their elected reps. very well. They also know the politician wants to be re elected. here comes the Pork, and here come the Lobbyist its a circle thats been going on for a real long time. It took someone like Jack Abar. to bring a lot of this out in the open.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2012, 03:47 PM
Status: "It Can't Rain All The Time" (set 29 days ago)
 
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,593,334 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by darstar View Post
Of coarse not and you know it....Aw maybe when Cheeny was running things and there was a lot being set behind closed doors. For the most part, the K street guys get to know their elected reps. very well. They also know the politician wants to be re elected. here comes the Pork, and here come the Lobbyist its a circle thats been going on for a real long time. It took someone like Jack Abar. to bring a lot of this out in the open.
Who? In other words who is Jack Abar? I've never heard of him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2012, 03:53 PM
Status: "It Can't Rain All The Time" (set 29 days ago)
 
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,593,334 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donna-501 View Post
Bush was interested in the Iraq war and not getting Bin Laden.
What was going on before 911 that would make you believe that Bush was only interested in the Iraq war? And then what 911 was the excuse he was looking for?

Also if this is true, was Bush a King that he could whatever he wanted to all by his lonesome?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2012, 03:53 PM
 
Location: State of Superior
8,733 posts, read 15,938,824 times
Reputation: 2869
Quote:
Originally Posted by actonbell View Post
Who? In other words who is Jack Abar? I've never heard of him.
A typo.Jack Abramoff, I am sure you have heard of this crook.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2012, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,801 posts, read 41,008,695 times
Reputation: 62194
For 2 years Obama had a Democrat Senate majority and a Democrat House majority. No budget, nothing to tackle the debt, nothing to get a grip on runaway entitlements, nothing on illegal immigration, no plan for jobs, no energy plan just a speech...but he managed to get Obamacare through even though the public told him time and tine again what they wanted him to concentrate on was jobs. He could have had any jobs plan he wanted in those two years. Pelosi could have passed one. Reid could have passed one, He could have presented one and signed it.

He went golfing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2012, 05:20 PM
 
Location: State of Superior
8,733 posts, read 15,938,824 times
Reputation: 2869
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
For 2 years Obama had a Democrat Senate majority and a Democrat House majority. No budget, nothing to tackle the debt, nothing to get a grip on runaway entitlements, nothing on illegal immigration, no plan for jobs, no energy plan just a speech...but he managed to get Obamacare through even though the public told him time and tine again what they wanted him to concentrate on was jobs. He could have had any jobs plan he wanted in those two years. Pelosi could have passed one. Reid could have passed one, He could have presented one and signed it.

He went golfing.
And the Righties just said no to everything. Do you know how hard it was to get some level of healthcare passed. ? Now its time to improve on it with single payer. The biggest barrier to the sucess of small business is healthcare cost. You will make more jobs when you can compete. Forget about China. A lot of auto production has gone to Canada, just because of rising healthcare costs.We don't need no stinkin Insurance Companies !!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 12:32 PM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by darstar View Post
Quick enough. Just a thought, Harry Reid does not have enough vote to override a filibuster . The Dems need more than a simple majority. I am not happy about the gridlock ether. It IS his job to count votes, that's why he is the leader.It was not that long ago that Healthcare passed, it wasn't easy if you recall. What got passed was not to my liking, and I was not alone. What we need is a way to get rid of Insurance Companies, big Pharma too, the Right endorsed, it was very costly and did more harm than good.
Watch the debates, they are only a few min. Away.
When was the last "real" filibuster?

Keep in mind it was Reid who came up with the current rules when he was in the minority.

What is good for the goose is good for that gander.

How can there be a filibuster of a bill when Reid won't let House version get out of his drawer.

Why won't he let his committees at least see the bills?

It has been stated by several dems in the Senate that they would LIKE to work on some of these bills because they have merit.

harry WON"T let his fellow Senators vote on bills BECAUSE he doesn't want his fellow dems to be on the record voting against certain things. it could be used against them in this re-election. There ARE ABOUT 27 DEMS SEEKING RE-ELCTION. heaven forbid they have a voting record for the voter to see.

if he is going to be afraid of bills being filerbusted and passed and NOT submitting a budget why are we paying them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top